Consumer acceptance of cultured meat
An in-depth qualitative assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21294898 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paola Castellani (0000-0002-8132-7632, University of Verona Department of Management), Fabio Cassia (0000-0001-8716-5489, University of Verona Department of Management), Alfonso Vargas-Sánchez (0000-0003-0588-8654, University of Huelva Faculty of Business Sciences and Tourism), Elena Giaretta (0000-0003-3619-9560, University of Verona Department of Management) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 231-248 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Food Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/bfj-05-2025-0697 |
| OpenAlex | W7129019587 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Purpose This study identifies the themes that consumers associate with attitudes towards, and intentions to purchase, cultured meat. It also examines the relationships between these themes and the drivers of innovation according to the diffusion of innovations theory proposed by Rogers. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was used to collect information from 256 participants. A specific type of content analysis, “cognitive analysis,” was performed on this information using Leximancer, which supports visually oriented sense-making. Findings The analysis revealed a variety of themes associated with attitudes towards, and intentions to purchase, cultured meat. Moreover, the diffusion of innovations theory emerged as a valuable framework for organising these themes around the five attributes of innovation: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability. Research limitations/implications This study examined the consumer perspective, but the acceptance and commercialisation of cultured meat will also depend on the attitudes and behaviours of several other actors (e.g. farmers), which need to be studied. Originality/value This study contributes to addressing several research priorities highlighted in recent literature on the consumer acceptance of cultured meat, including the need to conduct more qualitative studies and to apply the diffusion of innovations framework
Consumer behaviour · Content analysis · Diffusion of innovations · Diffusion theory · Innovation diffusion · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Variety (cybernetics) · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Organic Food and Agriculture · Wine Industry and Tourism
Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping
Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat
Attitudes to in vitro meat
‘Would you eat cultured meat?’
Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat
Consumer acceptance of cultured meat
Food innovation towards a sustainable world
On what basis is it agriculture
A diffusion of innovation (DOI) analysis of 3D food printing adoption among food sector early adopters
A systematic review of determinants of cultured meat adoption
Optimists, moderates and sceptics – identifying consumer groups and their willingness to consume cultured proteins in Finland
Consumer acceptance of cultured meat
Who killed food tourism? Unaware cannibalism in online conversations about traveling in Italy
Showcasing Leximancer in tourism and hospitality research
Consumer behavior towards cultured meat
Social research 2.0
The role of conventional meat unnaturalness in cultured meat acceptance
Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |