Can voluntary standards improve sustainability and welfare in the UK lamb sector? A survey analysis situated in the institutional context
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21295668 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Soledad Cuevas (0000-0002-4897-5240, Instituto de Economia, Geografia y Demografia, CSIC), Anna Kristina Edenbrandt (0000-0002-9298-6705, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Barbara Häesler (0000-0001-6073-9526, Royal Veterinary College) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-19 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-09 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Food Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/bfj-08-2025-1037 |
| OpenAlex | W7151925629 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
Purpose This study aims to analyse the potential and limitations of voluntary standards to improve environmental sustainability and welfare in the UK lamb sector. It addresses the following questions: (1) How do consumers value climate and animal welfare standards and related labels for UK lamb? (2) To what extent can existing and hypothetical voluntary standards promote sustainability (including animal welfare) in the UK lamb sector? Design/methodology/approach A framework based on institutional economics theory was used to conceptualise voluntary standards governance. A representative sample of 502 UK lamb consumers answered a survey including an attitudes questionnaire and a discrete choice experiment involving lamb products with labels indicating greenhouse gas emissions reduction, animal welfare, origin and quality. The survey was complemented with a rapid review of literature and institutional documents. Findings The potential of voluntary standards to promote sustainability in the UK lamb sector is limited by polarised beliefs around climate, which are associated with meat and food-related attitudes; limited credibility of welfare and environment-related labels and the presence of a substantial segment of consumers who are willing to pay for premium products over public goods. Supportive factors include a majority of consumers who, although price conscious, are willing to pay for public goods and a substantial share of consumers who are highly motivated about animal welfare. Originality/value This is the first study exploring the attitudes of different consumer segments towards welfare and climate-related labelling in UK lamb products in the context of voluntary standards governance and sector-specific challenges, drawing actionable insights for sustainability promotion
Animal welfare · Context (archaeology) · Credibility · Situated · Sustainability · Turnover · Welfare · Willingness to pay · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Organic Food and Agriculture
Applied Choice Analysis
The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research
Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Assessing climate change beliefs
Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research
Escaping the Red Queen
Analysing the policy space for the promotion of healthy, sustainable edible oil consumption in India
Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance
My country or my planet? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions
Animal health and welfare as a public good
An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production
Gauging attitudes and behaviours
Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
The politicisation of climate change attitudes in Europe
Hybrid governance and welfare standards for broiler chickens raised for human consumption
Structure and Context
| Highly cited | No |
|---|