Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From simplification to sophistication

Secondary students' conceptual change in understanding machine learning model decision making

Bibliographic Data

ID21297445
AuthorsLiu Dong (0009-0001-4105-2144, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, College of Education Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA, corresponding author), Shiyan Jiang (0000-0003-4781-846X, Department of Teacher Education and Learning Sciences, College of Education North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA), Fan Xu (0009-0001-2895-6798, Center on Education and Training for Employment Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA), Suzhen Duan (0000-0002-1272-719X, Department of Learning Technologies, Design and School Library Media, College of Education Towson University Towson Maryland USA), Chi‐Jia Hsieh (0009-0000-2776-2740, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, College of Education Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA)
Year2026
Volume57
Issue2
Pages423-442
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjet.70024
OpenAlexW4415026711
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited50

As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes the educational landscape, promoting AI literacy in secondary education has become increasingly important. Understanding how secondary students perceive AI, particularly the machine learning (ML) decision‐making process, is critical for equipping them to navigate an AI‐driven future. While prior research has highlighted the potential of AI education to foster meaningful engagement with AI concepts, little is known about how students conceptualize and understand the underlying mechanisms of ML. This study developed and implemented an AI module within English Language Arts classes in middle and high schools to demystify the ML decision‐making process. A total of 437 students from five schools participated in this research. Qualitative analyses of student responses revealed five distinct categories of understanding and misconceptions: (1) data‐based thinking, (2) divergent thinking, (3) anthropomorphic thinking, (4) awareness of limitations and (5) tale‐spin simplification. By mapping a progression in students' understanding from anthropomorphic interpretations towards a robust, data‐driven perspective, this study fills a critical research gap, offers valuable insights for fostering AI literacy in secondary education contexts, and provides actionable implications for curriculum design and future research aimed at addressing specific misconceptions about ML decision making. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Understanding the decision‐making process of machine learning models is essential for secondary learners to prepare them for navigating an AI‐driven world. Educators face significant challenges in making complex AI concepts accessible to younger students. Secondary students often hold misconceptions and fragmented understandings of the machine learning decision‐making process, resulting in a loss of control and reduced interest in further exploring AI concepts. What this paper adds This study developed and implemented an AI module for text mining and narrative modelling for secondary learners to demystify ML decision‐making process. This study introduces a robust coding framework to capture these evolving understandings of machine learning model decision making, including five key categories: ‘data‐based thinking’, ‘divergent thinking’, ‘anthropomorphic thinking’, ‘awareness of limitations’ and ‘tale‐spin simplification’. This study also demonstrates a progression in students' understanding, shifting from anthropomorphic interpretations to data‐driven perspectives. This study highlights the importance of helping students decouple their humanistic associations with language from the statistical, pattern‐based operations that drive language‐based AI models. Implications for Practice and/or Policy Educators and researchers might consider including ‘conceptual decoupling’ as a core competency within AI literacy, emphasizing the skills needed to differentiate human cognitive abilities from data‐driven processing in machine learning models. Educators can address these misconceptions by using analogies that emphasize AI's statistical nature, designing activities that compare human decision making with algorithmic processes and encouraging students to reflect on examples where AI ‘errors’ reveal the limitations of pattern‐based, non‐human reasoning. Educators should integrate culturally relevant examples to deepen their understanding of language patterns in model decision making.

Conceptual change · Curriculum · Face (sociological concept) · Literacy · Process (computing) · Qualitative research · Visual Literacy · Educational Games and Gamification · Online Learning and Analytics · Teaching and Learning Programming

  • Enact-Examine-Extract (E3)

    Open Access•Miao Yue, Morris Siu‐Yung Jong•International Journal of STEM…•2026

  • Enhancing secondary education through gamification and Bloom’s taxonomy

    Open Access•Nazym Baltabayeva, Saltanat Adikanova et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Artificial intelligence and computer science in education

    Martin Kandlhofer, Gerald Steinbauer et al.•2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education…•2016

  • What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations

    Open Access•Duri Long, Brian Magerko•Proceedings of the 2020 CHI…•2020

  • Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom

    Open Access•Yoshija Walter•International Journal of…•2024

  • Integrating Ethics and Career Futures with Technical Learning to Promote AI Literacy for Middle School Students

    Open Access•Helen Zhang, Irene Lee et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Conceptualizing AI literacy

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jac Ka Lok Leung et al.•Computers and Education:…•2021

  • Accommodation of a scientific conception

    Open Access•George J Posner, Kenneth A Strike et al.•Science Education•1982

  • Envisioning AI for K-12

    Open Access•David Touretzky, David S Touretzky et al.•Proceedings of the AAAI…•2019

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy education in secondary schools

    Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jiahong Su et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Promoting conceptual changes of artificial intelligence with technology-facilitated situational exploration and alternative thinking

    Xinli Zhang, Yuchen Chen et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • An empirical analysis of high school students' practices of modelling with unstructured data

    Open Access•Shiyan Jiang, Antonino Nocera et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Wenjie Wu et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2024

  • Culture, the process of knowledge, perception of the world and emergence of AI

    Open Access•Badrudin Amershi•AI & Society•2020

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    John W Creswell, Vicki L Plano Clark•Designing and Conducting Mixed…•2017

  • A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

    Open Access•Donald R Thomas, David R Thomas•American Journal of Evaluation•2006

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae