The Politics of Opting Out in the Age of Neoliberal Cynicism

Bibliographic Data

ID21314352
AuthorsQuentin Wheeler‐Bell (0000-0002-5091-4471, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Indiana University), Quentin Wheeler–Bell (Institute of Educational Policy, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume70
Issue3
Pages335-354
Publication date2020-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-2004 • E-ISSN: 1741-5446
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/edth.12428
OpenAlexW3081227264
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Within the past several years, parents, teachers, students, and community members have vociferously debated the value and importance of opting out of standardized testing. The debate has been sparked by an increasing number of parents, dubbed “opt‐out activists,” who refuse to have their children participate in federally mandated standards testing. However, an assortment of civil rights organizations and activists have challenged the opt‐out movement. Quentin Wheeler‐Bell argues that the debate between those in the opt‐out movement and the civil rights activists is an example of neoliberal cynicism. While both groups acknowledge (to different degrees) the structural problems inherent to the current testing regime, they both also make educational demands that assume equal educational opportunity is achievable within a capitalist system. In making this assumption that equal educational opportunity is valuable within capitalism, Wheeler‐Bell concludes, both sides ultimately reproduce neoliberal cynicism

Capitalism · Civil rights · Cynicism · Law and economics · Neoliberalism (international relations) · Opt-out · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Diverse Education Studies and Reforms · Law

Tools

Open DOI