Metrics of student dissatisfaction and disagreement
Longitudinal explorations of a national survey instrument
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21324352 |
|---|---|
| Autores | A Mark Langan (0000-0002-0482-1987, Manchester Metropolitan University, autor de correspondencia), W E Harris (0000-0002-9038-8656, Harper Adams University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 87 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 249-269 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0018-1560 • E-ISSN: 1573-174X |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10734-023-01004-0 |
| PMID | 37362752 |
| OpenAlex | W4361298479 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 67 |
This study explores dissatisfaction and neutrality metrics from 12 years of a national-level undergraduate student survey. The notion of dissatisfaction is much less prevalent in the narratives surrounding student survey outcomes, and the underpinning metrics are seldom considered. This is despite an increasingly vociferous debate about ‘value for money’ of higher education and the positioning of students as consumers in a marketised sector. We used machine learning methods to explore over 2.7 million national survey outcomes from 154 institutions to describe year-on-year stability in the survey items that best predicted dissatisfaction and neutrality, together with their similarity to known metric predictors of satisfaction. The widely publicised annual increases in student ‘satisfaction’ are shown to be the result of complex reductions in the proportions of disagreement and neutrality across different survey dimensions. Due to the widespread use of survey metrics in university league tables, we create an anonymised, illustrative table to demonstrate how UK institutional rankings would have differed if dissatisfaction metrics had been the preferred focus for reporting. We conclude by debating the tensions of balancing the provision of valuable information about dissatisfaction, with perpetuating negative impacts that derive from this important subset of the survey population
Business · Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Higher education · League table · Metric (unit) · Neutrality · Political science · Population · Sociology · Statistics · Survey data collection · Survey instrument · Applied Psychology · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Demography · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Higher Education Research Studies · Marketing · Psychology
Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education
Variable selection using random forests
Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university
The competition fetish in higher education
Random Forests
The Impact of Academic Aspect Quality on Student Disengagement in Higher Education
Student Surveys
The datafication of teaching in Higher Education
The National Student Survey and the ‘customerization’ of university students
Instruments for obtaining student feedback
The structure of surveys and the peril of panels
The influence of online ratings and reviews on hotel booking consideration
The UK National Student Survey
Campbell’s Law and the Ethics of Immensurability
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
The key to successful achievement as an undergraduate student
Student Satisfaction
Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction
The National Student Survey
A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education
The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire
Student Evaluations of Teaching as 'Fact-Totems
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |