Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spatial supports for comparison in educational science images

Bibliographic Data

ID21335964
AuthorsBenjamin D Jee (0000-0003-1007-8883, Worcester State University, corresponding author), Bryan J Matlen (0000-0001-5989-6997, Wested), Monica Greenlaw (Worcester State University), Nina Simms (0000-0003-0830-5194, Northwestern University), Dedre Gentner (0000-0002-5120-6688, Northwestern University)
Year2022
Volume50
Issue6
Pages807-827
Publication date2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInstructional Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-4277 • E-ISSN: 1573-1952
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11251-022-09599-0
OpenAlexW4295828548
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited87

Images, such as photographs and diagrams, play an important role in the teaching and learning of science. To optimize student learning, educational science images should be designed to facilitate the cognitive processes relevant to comprehension. One such process is comparison, which involves aligning multiple representations on the basis of their common relational structure. This structural alignment process can be facilitated by cognitive supports that are inherent to an image, including its spatial layout. Yet, little is known about the extent to which students must engage in comparison to learn from science images, and whether widely-used educational materials are conducive to structural alignment. To address these issues, we sampled multiple chapters from each of three popular U.S. middle school life science textbooks. We coded each image for the presence of prompts for comparison using cues within the images and surrounding text. For each image that prompted comparison, we coded whether its layout facilitated relevant structural alignment ( direct placement of matched pairs) or obscured alignment ( impeded placement). Overall, we found that comparisons were prompted for more than a third of the images. However, fewer than half of the images that required comparison had a spatial layout that provided strong support for comparison—that is, direct placement of matched objects/parts. We propose that, in concert with other cognitive supports for learning from multiple representations, spatial supports for comparison could be applied broadly to increase the effectiveness of educational science images

Cognition · Comprehension · Educational psychology · Mathematics education · Process (computing) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Spatial Cognition and Navigation · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes

  • Learning the control-of-variables strategy during an informal science lesson on popping popcorn

    Bradley J Morris, Jacob Cason et al.•International Journal of Science…•2024

  • Spatial Thinking and STEM Education

    Open Access•David H Uttal, Cheryl A Cohen•The Psychology of learning and…•2012

  • Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons

    Open Access•Arthur B Markman, Dedre Gentner•Cognitive Psychology•1993

  • The structure-mapping engine

    Open Access•Brian Falkenhainer, Kenneth D Forbus et al.•Artificial Intelligence•1989

  • Spatial ability for STEM domains

    Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2009

  • Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation

    Open Access•Wolfgang Schnotz, Maria Bannert•Learning and Instruction•2003

  • Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load

    Open Access•John Sweller•Educational Psychology Review•2010

  • Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning

    Richard E Mayer, Roxana Moreno•Educational Psychologist•2003

  • Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning

    Open Access•Richard E Mayer, Logan Fiorella•The Cambridge Handbook of…•2014

  • Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

    Charles L Folk, Roger W Remington et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1992

  • Drawing to Learn in Science

    Open Access•Shaaron Aınsworth, Shaaron Ainsworth et al.•Science•2011

  • Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction

    Open Access•Slava Kalyuga•Educational Psychology Review•2007

  • Structure‐Mapping

    Open Access•Dedre Gentner•Cognitive Science•1983

  • DeFT

    Open Access•Shaaron Aınsworth, Shaaron Ainsworth•Learning and Instruction•2006

  • Bootstrapping the Mind

    Open Access•Dedre Gentner•Cognitive Science•2010

  • Cognitive principles of multimedia learning

    Roxana Moreno, Richard E Mayer•Journal of Educational Psychology•1999

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Structure mapping in analogy and similarity

    Dedre Gentner, Arthur B Markman•American Psychologist•1997

  • Text comprehension, memory, and learning

    Walter Kintsch•American Psychologist•1994

  • Biology Textbook Graphics and Their Impact on Expectations of Understanding

    Jennifer Wiley, David Sarmento et al.•Discourse Processes•2017

  • Analogical processes in children’s understanding of spatial representations

    Open Access•Lei Yuan, David H Uttal et al.•Developmental Psychology•2017

  • Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions

    Open Access•Matthew A Kraft•Educational Researcher•2020

  • Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research

    Micah B Goldwater, Lennart Schalk•Psychological Bulletin•2016

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae