Creative Self‐Efficacy and Metacognitive Feelings as Sources of Information when Generating, Evaluating, and Selecting Creative Ideas
A Metacognitive Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21345263 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rogelio Puente-Díaz (0000-0001-6777-7103, Department of Business and Economics Universidad Anáhuac Mexico, corresponding author), Judith Cavazos Arroyo (0000-0002-6258-289X, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla), Judith Cavazos‐Arroyo (Centro Interdisciplinario de Posgrados Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 647-658 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Creative Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0175 • E-ISSN: 2162-6057 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/jocb.557 |
| OpenAlex | W4288700911 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 26 |
In one study, we examined the relationships between pre‐task creative self‐efficacy, post‐task creative confidence, self‐rated and judges‐rated creativity evaluations, metacognitive feelings, and idea selection under a metacognitive framework. Four hundred and fourteen college students were asked to complete a divergent thinking problem in the domain of marketing and completed several questionnaires measuring pre‐task creative self‐efficacy, post‐task creative confidence, idea evaluation and selection, and metacognitive feelings. Independent judges evaluated the creativity of each idea generated and ranked ideas from the most to the least creative. Results showed positive relationships between pre‐task creative self‐efficacy and post‐task creative confidence, self‐ and judges‐rated creativity evaluations and metacognitive feelings. In addition, metacognitive feelings and self‐rated creative evaluations predicted post‐task confidence. We also observed evidence for positive connections between metacognitive feelings and self‐rated evaluations and greater probability of choosing the first idea brought to mind as the best idea than what was expected by chance. The implications of the results were discussed
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Creative thinking · Creativity · Feeling · Metacognition · Perspective (graphical) · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Self-confidence · Self-efficacy · Task (project management) · Artificial Intelligence · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Social Psychology
From text understanding to creativity
Generative AI and creative self-efficacy
AI self-efficacy and knowledge graph-integrated generative AI feedback in higher education
“My Brain Said That … ”
A Wandering Mind is Not Always a Creative Mind
The ACT‐ON Ideas Framework
Contributions of Metacognition to Creative Performance and Behavior
Toward Untangling Creative Self-Beliefs
Feelings-as-Information Theory
Creative mindsets
Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks.
Intellectual risk taking
Idea Generation, Selection, and Evaluation
You may be more original than you think
The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |