Gender differences in early literacy

Boys’ response to formal instruction

Bibliographic Data

ID21347749
AuthorsErin M McTigue (0000-0002-3245-9719, University of Stavanger), Knut Schwippert (0000-0002-4000-9726, Universität Hamburg), Per Henning Uppstad (0000-0002-5775-9830, University of Stavanger), Kjersti Lundetræ (0000-0001-5055-6769, University of Stavanger), Oddny Judith Solheim (0000-0002-9365-9052, University of Stavanger)
Year2021
Volume113
Issue4
Pages690-705
Publication date2021-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0663 • E-ISSN: 1939-2176
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/edu0000626
OpenAlexW3089622772
LanguageEN
Citations received14

Research consistently documents that girls outperform boys in literacy achievement, yet, when considering the starting point—early literacy—we do not have consensus on the origin, meaningful nature, or persistence of such differences. In this two-part study analyzing 5,816 Norwegian students (48.1% girls, average age of 6.1 years), we first considered the presence and meaningful nature of gender differences at school entry. Presence of differences, advantaging girls, was found in letter-recognition, phonemic awareness, word reading accuracy, and spelling. We found no differences in vocabulary performance. However, wide score distributions suggest that intragroup differences are more meaningful than intergroup differences. In our second analysis, using a longitudinal design with three time points (school entry, end of Grade 1, end of Grade 2), we calculated a general latent literacy score based on an IRT model. Multilevel analysis tested the persistence of gender differences after formal instruction. Growth curve analysis of the latent literacy score verified an advantage for girls at school entry and that boys’ scores grew at a significantly higher rate than girls across Grades 1 and 2. Patterns of effect sizes complement the statistical analysis. In summary, findings indicate that girls’ small initial advantage in literacy skill at school entry persists into Grade 2, but it is substantially attenuated with formal instruction. Implications include that gender differences are secondary to other sources of heterogeneity in early literacy and that gender differences in early literacy at school entry do not directly lead to boys’ long-term underachievement in literacy. Future directions should examine if self-selection of activities in early childhood education may contribute to early literacy differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Developmental psychology · Early literacy · Literacy · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Child Development and Digital Technology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Educational Methods and Media Use · Psychology

Tools

Open DOI