Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Problem‐Solving Team Effectiveness Scale—Revised
Bibliographic Data
As schools refine problem‐solving processes within a Multi‐Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) framework, a brief, psychometrically‐sound measure that evaluates effective intervention practices is needed. The Problem‐Solving Team Effectiveness Scale was one such measure, but clinical feedback and comparison to best practices suggested a need to update the measure. The current study outlines the development of the Problem‐Solving Team Effectiveness Scale‐Revised and examines psychometric properties with a sample of 492 school counselors and school psychologists. We found evidence supporting four factors: Acceptability and Feasibility, Data‐Based Decision Making, Services to Minoritized Students, and Intervention Knowledge and Integrity. Scale reliability was adequate, and subtest intercorrelations and regression analyses with related measures provided initial evidence of construct validity. For further validity evidence, the survey differentiated between MTSS implementation stages. We review implications for problem‐solving teams monitoring effective practices and describe future research directions
Best practice · Construct (python library) · Construct validity · Intervention (counseling) · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor) · Scale (ratio) · Test validity · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Problem Solving Skills Development
Making Sense of Factor Analysis
Social Validity
A review of research on fidelity of implementation
A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1
Exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity of the interventionist knowledge and skills survey
Across the Great Divide
A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation
Improving Programs and Outcomes
Scale Development Research
Validity of psychological assessment
| Highly cited | No |
|---|