Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Psychosocial safety climate

Measurement and relationship with well‐being in a four‐wave longitudinal study during remote work

Bibliographic Data

ID21392096
AuthorsSoile Juutinen (0000-0002-0320-7731, Faculty of Social Sciences, Work Research Centre Tampere University Tampere Finland, corresponding author), Kirsi Sjöblom (0000-0002-3333-3050, Faculty of Social Sciences, Work Research Centre Tampere University Tampere Finland), Maureen Dollard (0000-0002-3128-8727, PSC Global Observatory Centre for Workplace Excellence University of South Australia Adelaide Australia), Anne Mäkikangas (0000-0003-0199-3609, Faculty of Social Sciences, Work Research Centre Tampere University Tampere Finland)
Year2023
Volume64
Issue4
Pages504-511
Publication date2023-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.12917
PMID37092361
OpenAlexW4366822099
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited27

To create healthy workplaces, organizations need tools for assessing factors contributing to employee well‐being. Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) refers to shared perceptions regarding the extent to which psychological health and safety are prioritized in organizations; it is operationalized in the PSC scale. We evaluated the factor structure of the Finnish version of the PSC‐4 scale, its invariance across time and concurrent and predictive relationships with perceived stress, job exhaustion, and work engagement. Moreover, the mean‐level changes in PSC and well‐being during enforced remote work were studied. Participants were 442 higher education employees who completed a well‐being survey four times between April 2020 and February 2021. The longitudinal factor structure of the PSC‐4 and well‐being indicators were investigated using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The statistical analyses supported the one‐factor structure of the PSC‐4 and its measurement invariance across time. PSC was negatively associated with concurrent stress and job exhaustion and positively associated with concurrent work engagement at each measurement. Moreover, PSC predicted subsequent stress between each time point. Cross‐lagged effects were also evident for job exhaustion at T2–T3 and T3–T4 and for work engagement at T1–T2. The mean level of PSC decreased during enforced remote work. To conclude, the Finnish PSC‐4 is a valid tool for evaluating perceived psychosocial safety climate in organizations. PSC predicted well‐being over time and showed subsequent relationships with job exhaustion and work engagement, which is a new contribution to PSC theory and literature. Organizations need to design interventions to improve it, especially during stressful times

Confirmatory factor analysis · Measurement invariance · Operationalization · Psychosocial · Scale (ratio) · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Work (physics) · Work engagement · Applied Psychology · Engineering · Mathematics · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Psychology · Social Psychology · Stress and Burnout Research · Workplace Health and Well-being

  • How university climate impacts psychosocial safety, psychosocial risk, and mental health among staff in Australian higher education

    Open Access•Xuan Luu, Christine Rathjens et al.•Higher Education•2025

  • Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement

    Open Access•Maureen Dollard, Maureen F Dollard et al.•Journal of Occupational and…•2010

  • The cost of work-related stress to society

    Juliet Hassard, Kevin Teoh et al.•Journal of Occupational Health…•2018

  • Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms

    Open Access•Anna-Liisa Elo, ANNELI LEPPÄNEN et al.•Scandinavian Journal of Work,…•2003

  • An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement

    Wilmar B Schaufeli, Akihito Shimazu et al.•European Journal of Psychological…•2019

  • Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

    Fangfang Chen, Fang Fang Chen•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Species Richness of Parasite Assemblages

    Richard Poulin, Robert Poulin•Annual Review of Ecology and…•1997

  • Job demands–resources theory

    Arnold B Bakker, Evangelia Demerouti•Journal of Occupational Health…•2017

  • In Search of Golden Rules

    Herbert W Marsh, Kit-Tai Hau et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2004

  • The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout

    Open Access•Wilmar B Schaufeli, Marisa Salanova et al.•Journal of Happiness Studies•2002

  • A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis

    Open Access•Albert Satorra, Peter M Bentler•Psychometrika•2001

  • Why increase in telework may have affected employee well-being during the Covid-19 pandemic? The role of work and non-work life domains

    Open Access•Janne Kaltiainen, Jari Hakanen•Current Psychology•2024

  • Benchmarks for Evidence-Based Risk Assessment with the Swedish Version of the 4-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale

    Open Access•Hanne Berthelsen, Tuija Muhonen et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability

    Open Access•Wilmar B Schaufeli, Steffie Desart et al.•International Journal of…•2020

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae