The reverse Matilda effect
Gender bias and the impact of highlighting the contributions of women to a STEM field on its perceived attractiveness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392736 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W P Malecki (0000-0003-4768-713X, Institute of Polish Philology Wrocław Poland), Marta Kowal (0000-0001-9050-1471, Institute of Psychology University of Wrocław Wrocław Poland), Anna Krasnodębska (0000-0001-5451-1031, WSB Merito University Opole Poland), Bertram C Bruce (0000-0001-7392-6945, School of Information Sciences the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Champaign Illinois USA), P Sorokowski (0000-0001-9225-9965, Institute of Psychology University of Wrocław Wrocław Poland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1474-1491 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21878 |
| OpenAlex | W4399038131 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 90 |
It is often assumed that highlighting the contributions of female researchers to STEM fields may make those fields more attractive to women, thereby encouraging female participation. The present study (n = 802) aimed to test that assumption by investigating the impact of messages highlighting the contributions of women researchers to two STEM fields, (mathematics and biology) on the perception of those fields among high school students and comparing it to the impact of analogous messages concerning three nonSTEM fields. We found that these messages did not encourage women to participate in the respective academic fields, in STEM or otherwise. And more strongly they led both women and men to see that academic field as less interesting and worthy of study. We propose that the effect observed here, and previously not discussed in the literature, is the reverse of the well‐known Matilda effect. If the Matilda effect consists in a tendency to ignore or downplay the academic contributions of women based on the assumption that only men can contribute real value to research, then what we observed in our study is that that same assumption apparently makes people think that if women excel in certain fields, then those fields must be less valuable than others. We also argue that these effects are the result of gender stereotyping that takes what are supposedly male characteristics as better suited for research work than what are supposedly female characteristics. Finally, we suggest how to counteract this reverse Matilda Effect
Attractiveness · Developmental psychology · Field (mathematics) · Gender bias · Level playing field · Physical attractiveness · Career Development and Diversity · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Psychology · Science Education and Perceptions · Social Psychology
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands
Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls’ and Women’s Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research
In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening
How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers
Motivation and social cognitive theory
The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
Even Einstein struggled
Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination?
BlackGirlMagic
Inside the Double Bind
The Development of Children's Gender-Science Stereotypes
Pretty as a Princess
Women are credited less in science than men
Linking intersectional invisibility and hypervisibility to experiences of microaggressions among graduate women of color in STEM
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.
Asian American women in STEM in the lab with “White Men Named John”
“If We Don't Have Diversity, There's No Future to See”
Improving Girls’ Sense of Fit in Science
My Fair Physicist? Feminine Math and Science Role Models Demotivate Young Girls
Sexism As A Means Of Reproduction
The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling
Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept
Female Role Models
How Biographies of Women in Science, Technology, and Medicine Influence Fifth Graders’ Attitudes Toward Gender Roles
Effective Experiences
Does university context play a role in mitigating threatening race-STEM stereotypes? Test of the stereotype inoculation model
Why they leave
The Impact of Conservative Discourses in Family Policies, Population Politics, and Gender Rights in Poland and Turkey
I Just Couldn’t Fit It In’
Women, know your limits
Stereotypes About Gender and Science
Exploring Identity-Safety Cues and Allyship Among Black Women Students in STEM Environments
Seeing What’s Possible
But You Don’t Look Like A Scientist
Why Do Women Endorse Hostile and Benevolent Sexism? The Role of Salient Female Subtypes and Internalization of Sexist Contents
The Stereotypical Computer Scientist
How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM
Why Do Women Still Not Make It to the Top? Dominant Organizational Ideologies and Biases by Promotion Committees Limit Opportunities to Destination Positions
Addressing Unintended Consequences of Gender Diversity Interventions on Women’s Sense of Belonging in STEM
In Pursuit of the MD
The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science
The Matilda Effect in science
A Second Look at the Process of Occupational Feminization and Pay Reduction in Occupations
Occupational Feminization and Pay
Gender labeling, gender stereotyping, and parenting behaviors
Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements
Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments
One size may not fit all
Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women
Right-wing populism and feminist politics
The Matilda Effect in Science Communication
The face of STEM
STEMing the tide
Social Cognitive Theory
When Does Contact with Successful Ingroup Members Change Self-Stereotypes
The agony of stereotyping holds Black women back
Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |