Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Learning to see, seeing to learn

Impacts of an online tool on volunteers' observational practices during aquatic macroinvertebrate identification

Bibliographic Data

ID21392873
AuthorsMarti Louw (0000-0002-4178-1291, Human‐Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA), Camellia W Sanford‐Dolly (0000-0003-3971-2892, Rockman et al Cooperative Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume108
Issue1
Pages332-364
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sce.21834
OpenAlexW4386802220
LanguageEN
References cited84

Scientific observation is a disciplinary‐informed way of looking at the world that requires the coordination of domain knowledge and perceptual skills with specialized tools and techniques to systematically identify objects, organisms, specimens, or phenomena of interest. Identification is a particular form of skilled observational practice where the observer recognizes key features for classification. Learning to see like a scientist is crucial for many citizen science activities, yet participants often have limited access to training and resources needed to practice. We posit that observational fluency development in taxonomic identification activities for citizen science has two components: (1) increased accuracy in noticing relevant features, and (2) use of more disciplinary‐based explanatory language; and self‐efficacy is crucial while developing these competencies. This study explores the extent to which an interactive visual identification platform supports learners' observational fluency development in the context of aquatic macroinvertebrate identification in environmental education. We examined changes in water quality monitoring volunteers' accuracy, self‐efficacy, and explanatory language use after participation in a training that integrated the online identification (ID) tool. Methods included surveys, focus groups, and an ID accuracy task before and after training. Our findings indicate that learners, especially novices, demonstrated increased self‐efficacy and accuracy in specimen identifications after participating in a training utilizing the online tool. They also shifted their ID justifications, incorporating more scientific terminology and salient diagnostic characters, and fewer generic descriptive adjectives. Results suggest that trainings using dynamic visual tools can positively impact observational fluency development and the quality of data contributed by volunteers

Context (archaeology) · Data science · Discipline · Experiential learning · Fluency · Geography · Identification (biology) · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Observational learning · Observational study · Science education · Terminology · Animal and Plant Science Education · Computer Science · Data Visualization and Analytics · Ecology · Psychology · Species Distribution and Climate Change

  • Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data

    Michelene T H Chi, Michelene T H•Journal of the Learning Sciences•1997

  • Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students

    Open Access•Shari L Britner, Frank Pajares•Journal of Research in Science…•2006

  • Engagement in science through citizen science

    Open Access•Tina B Phillips, Heidi L Ballard et al.•Science Education•2019

  • Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool

    Janis L Dickinson, Benjamin Zuckerberg et al.•Annual Review of Ecology,…•2010

  • A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring

    Open Access•CATHY CONRAD, Cathy C Conrad et al.•Environmental Monitoring and…•2011

  • A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science

    Open Access•Tina Phillips, Tina B Phillips et al.•Citizen Science: Theory and…•2018

  • Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning

    Open Access•Richard E Mayer, Logan Fiorella•The Cambridge Handbook of…•2014

  • Assessing data quality in citizen science

    Open Access•Margaret Kosmala, Andrea Wiggins et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2016

  • Object categories and expertise

    Open Access•James W Tanaka, Marjorie Taylor•Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement

    Open Access•Janis L Dickinson, Jennifer Shirk et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2012

  • Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection

    Open Access•Duncan C McKinley, Abe J Miller-Rushing et al.•Biological Conservation•2017

  • Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning

    Dale Schunk, Dale H Schunk•Educational Psychologist•1990

  • A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry

    Chris Quintana, Brian J Reiser et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2004

  • The Qualitative Researcher's Companion

    A Michael Huberman, A Huberman et al.•The Qualitative Researcher's…•2002

  • Missed opportunities for observation‐based ecology in the Next Generation Science Standards

    Open Access•Eileen G Merritt, Nicole Bowers•Science Education•2020

  • Self-efficacy

    Albert Bandura•Psychological Review•1977

  • Supporting Observing-on-the-Move with Proximity-Based Technology

    Susan M Land, Heather Toomey Zimmerman et al.•Visitor Studies•2020

  • Making Classifications (at) Work

    Open Access•Wolff-Michael Roth•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects

    Open Access•Susan Leigh Star, James Griesemer et al.•Social Studies of Science•1989

  • Discipline and the Material Form of Images

    Open Access•Michael Lynch, Michael S Lynch•Social Studies of Science•1985

  • Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing

    Open Access•John Law, Michael Lynch et al.•Human Studies•1988

  • Individual- and community-level impacts of volunteer environmental monitoring

    Open Access•Kristine F Stepenuck, Linda T Green•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Jeremy Vetter•Science in Context•2011

  • Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems

    Open Access•Caren B Cooper, Janis Dickinson et al.•Conservation Ecology•2007

  • Public Participation in Scientific Research

    Open Access•Jennifer L Shirk, Jennifer Shirk et al.•Conservation Ecology•2012

  • Volunteer stream monitoring

    Open Access•Richard G Storey, Aslan Wright-Stow et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • On Scientific Observation

    Lorraine Daston•Isis•2008

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae