Crafting strategic responses to ecosystem dynamics in manufacturing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21401104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aylin Ates (0000-0003-4072-5519, University of Strathclyde, corresponding author), Steve Paton (0000-0002-7307-9333, University of Strathclyde), Harry Sminia (0000-0003-3740-4757, University of Strathclyde), Marisa Smith (University of Strathclyde) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 194 |
| Pages | 122727 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122727 |
| OpenAlex | W4383031866 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 55 |
This research goes beyond the dyadic view of co-opetition in supply chains and seeks to explore how firms that act as suppliers in a dynamic manufacturing ecosystem establish and sustain their strategic position. We interviewed 31 senior managers in seven firms that were identified by a committee representing government and academia as occupying various advanced manufacturing ecosystems. We argue that as actors within a manufacturing ecosystem interact overt time to co-create the overall product-service offerings, new relationships may be formed, and existing connections may be dissolved, giving rise to three co-opetition dynamics at the ecosystem level - capability configuration, value appropriation, and network governance. Our analysis unveiled eighteen operational tactics that suppliers deploy which combine to produce nine strategic responses that allow them to sustain their position within manufacturing ecosystems. Specifically, we discuss the role of suppliers in manufacturing ecosystems and capture the relationship between ecosystem dynamics and the strategic responses as they accommodate co-opetition. This research indicates that ecosystem performance is essentially a dynamic effort, which is simultaneously collective and distributed. Thus, policymakers should avoid carrying out analysis based on overly linear and single industry conceptualisations of manufacturing value networks
Appropriation · Business · Business ecosystem · Corporate governance · Economics · Ecosystem · Environmental resource management · Government (linguistics) · Industrial organization · Knowledge management · Position (finance) · Service (business) · Value (mathematics) · Value capture · Value creation · Business Strategy and Innovation · Computer Science · Digital Platforms and Economics · Ecology · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Marketing
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct
Servitization of business
Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms
Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory
Technology Ecosystem Governance
Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously
Innovation ecosystems
Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
Creating value in ecosystems
A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis
Value creation in innovation ecosystems
Case Study Research
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
Entrepreneurship and Development
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
Using thematic analysis in psychology
A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |