Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Validation of the ABL + DT model

An ecosystemic framework for integrating arts and digital technologies in primary education

Bibliographic Data

ID21445019
AuthorsNella Escala (0000-0002-1785-717X, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona Spain, corresponding author), Montse Guitert Catasús (0000-0001-8144-7629, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona Spain), Teresa Romeu (0000-0002-4866-4389, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona Spain)
Year2026
Publication date2026-04-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-1926 • E-ISSN: 1469-3518
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/berj.70164
OpenAlexW7151839851
LanguageEN
References cited46

Primary education teachers face increasing challenges in engaging diverse learners and fostering creativity, digital competence and other transversal skills, often lacking clear, practical guidance for integrating these skills into their classrooms. The ABL + DT (Arts‐Based Learning with Digital Technologies) model responds to this challenge by proposing a systemic framework connecting artistic practices, digital competence and educational innovation through four interconnected components: Relational Context, Design, Implementation and Evaluation. This study validates the content and construct of the ABL + DT model through an expert panel in primary school contexts. A mixed‐methods design was applied with 20 interdisciplinary experts (teachers, cultural mediators and researchers) from Spain and Ecuador. The validation instrument was designed to assess the clarity, coherence, relevance and practical applicability of the model. Quantitative analyses included the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Cronbach's alpha, complemented by qualitative thematic analysis of open‐ended expert comments. Findings showed excellent content validity and strong internal consistency. The Relational Context and Design phases identified areas for refinement, particularly in the engagement of families and community partners and in the operationalisation of transversal competencies, whereas the Implementation and Evaluation phases showed the strongest reliability and conceptual alignment. Overall, results confirm that the ABL + DT model is a valid and applicable framework for primary education, whose successful adoption depends on contextual adaptation, sustained teacher support and partnerships with cultural institutions to promote creative, reflective and socially relevant learning

Competence (human resources) · Conceptual framework · Construct (python library) · Construct validity · Content analysis · Content validity · Context (archaeology) · Face validity · Qualitative property · Thematic analysis · Art Education and Development · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Digital literacy in education

  • Art for Art's Sake?

    Ellen Winner, Thalia R Goldstein et al.•Art for Art's Sake?•2013

  • Beyond Academic Learning

    Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, OECD OECD•Beyond Academic Learning First…•2021

  • Education for sustainable development

    UNESCO UNESCO•Education for sustainable…•2020

  • The Maker Movement in Education

    Erica Rosenfeld Halverson, Kyoko Sheridan et al.•Harvard Educational Review•2014

  • Design and Implementation Content Validity Study

    Open Access•Vahid Zamanzadeh, Akram Ghahramanian et al.•Journal of Caring Sciences•2015

  • School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work

    Jodie Levin Epstein•Journal of Education for Teaching…•2018

  • Assessment and Classroom Learning

    Paul Black, Dylan Wiliam•Assessment in Education:…•1998

  • The content validity index

    Open Access•Denise F Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck•Research in Nursing & Health•2006

  • Facilitating Systems Thinking Through Arts-Based STEM Integration

    Open Access•Robert W Danielson, Elizabeth Grace et al.•Frontiers in Education•2022

  • The Role of the Arts in the Classroom

    Open Access•Julia Lauss, Charles Helm•Education Sciences•2024

  • Distributed Leadership

    Open Access•Marisol Galdames-Calderón•Education Sciences•2023

  • Teaching art and design in a digital age

    Open Access•Wycliff Edwin Tusiime, Monica Johannesen et al.•Journal of Vocational Education…•2022

  • Reimagining the futures of education

    Open Access•Stefania Giannini•Prospects•2025

  • Lifelong Kindergarten

    Ken Robinson, Mitchel Resnick•Lifelong kindergarten•2017

  • Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development

    Open Access•Linda Darling-Hammond, Lisa Flook et al.•Applied Developmental Science•2020

  • Contemporary Approaches to Mixed Methods–Grounded Theory Research

    Open Access•Timothy C Guetterman, Wayne A Babchuk et al.•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2017

  • Implementing Integration in an Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study of Belief Bias About Climate Change With High School Students

    Open Access•Matthew T McCrudden, Erin M McTigue•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2018

  • One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae