Peer assessment in medical communication skills training in programmatic assessment

INTRODUCTION: Current literature recommends assessment of communication skills in medical education combining different settings and multiple observers. There is still a gap in understanding about whether and how peers assessment facilitates learning in communication skills training. METHODS: We designed a qualitative study using focus group interviews and thematic analysis, in a medical course in the Netherlands. We aimed to explore medical students' and teachers' experiences, perceptions, and perspectives about challenges and facilitating factors in PACST (Peer assessment in medical communication skills training). RESULTS: Most of the participants reported that peer feedback was a valuable experience when learning communication skills. The major challenges for the quality and credibility of PACST reported by the participants are the question whether peer feedback is critical enough for learning and the difficulty of actually engaging students in the assessment process. CONCLUSION: Teachers reviewing students' peer assessments may improve the quality and their credibility and the reviewed assessments can best be used for learning purposes. We suggest to pay sufficient attention to teachers' roles in PACST, ensuring a safe and trustworthy environment and additionally helping students to internalize the value of being vulnerable during the evaluation process

Communication skills · Communication skills training · Medical education · Peer Assessment · Perception · Qualitative research · Training (meteorology) · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Innovations in Medical Education · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Psychology

• Consensus framework for good assessment

  John J Norcini, M Brownell Anderson et al.•Medical Teacher•2018

  Add to list

• Using thematic analysis in psychology

  Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  Add to list

• The Power of Feedback

  Open Access•John Hattie, Helen Timperley•Review of Educational Research•2007

  Add to list