Should we add patients in concordance of judgment learning tool panels? - An analysis between patients and primary care physicians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21447761 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mathieu Lorenzo (0000-0002-4597-4621, Department of General practice, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France, corresponding author), Pierre Bailly (0000-0001-8187-8672, Department of General practice, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France), Camille Lépine (Department of General practice, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 697-704 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Teacher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0142159x.2023.2274285 |
| PMID | 37917989 |
| OpenAlex | W4388210432 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
INTRODUCTION: The Concordance of Judgment Learning Tool (CJLT) has been developed for distance asynchronous learning of professionalism in health sciences education. The learning of professionalism is induced by a student's comparison of their own responses with those of the panel members. Whilst CJLT programs typically include same profession experts in their panels, we believe that they could also include patients. Accordingly, we conducted a study aimed at comparing CJLT response patterns between two groups of primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients. METHODS: We conducted a mixed prospective study of responses to a CJLT program based on a group of PCPs and a group of patients: an analysis of the response patterns of the two groups and a qualitative analysis of justifications. RESULTS: A total of 110 participants were included in the study: 70 patients and 40 PCPs. We found a significant difference in response patterns between the PCP and patient groups for nine of the fifteen questions (60%). The qualitative analysis of justifications between groups allowed us to comprehend patients' views on the professionalism of PCPs. CONCLUSIONS: Including patients in CJLT panels can enrich the feedback offered to students in these online training programs
Concordance · Family medicine · Medical education · MEDLINE · Primary care · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Innovations in Medical Education · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology
Granularity matters
Developing evaluative judgement
Self-Regulation, Coregulation, and Socially Shared Regulation
Why Open-Ended Survey Questions Are Unlikely to Support Rigorous Qualitative Insights
Likert scales
Using multiple self‐regulated learning measures to understand medical students' biomedical science learning
Re‐opening Pandora's box
How to conceptualise self‐regulated learning
Patients' perspectives on medical students' professionalism
Opening up learning conversations
Thematic analysis of qualitative data
| Highly cited | No |
|---|