Governance options for effective interprofessional education

Exposing the gap between education and healthcare services

Bibliographic Data

ID21448817
AuthorsMaree O’Keefe (0000-0002-0371-5322, The University of Adelaide, corresponding author), Dawn Forman (0000-0002-3919-8291, College of Health and Social Care, The University of Derby, Derby, UK), Mónica Morán (0000-0002-0353-6244, WA Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western, Karratha, Australia), Carole Steketee (0000-0002-8427-7845, The Learning and Teaching Office, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia)
Year2020
Volume42
Issue10
Pages1148-1153
Publication date2020-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Teacher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0142159x.2020.1795096
PMID32707007
OpenAlexW3045391967
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited29

CONTEXT: The increase in interprofessional models of collaborative practice and identification of health services as interprofessional organisations, sits somewhat awkwardly with traditional governance systems for both health services and educational institutions. Whereas health services have a primary focus on assuring competence and safety for health care practice, educational institutions have a primary focus on assuring academic standards within specific qualifications. Bridging the gap between these two systems with a workable option has proven challenging, especially in relation to interprofessional education (IPE). OBJECTIVES: Given the need to ensure 'work ready' graduates within a more interprofessional and collaborative workforce, it is important to review the quality assurance governance models that are in place and to consider which of these existing governance systems, if either, is the more appropriate model for enabling and supporting IPE. METHODS: This paper describes current issues in relation to governance for quality assurance, summarises the current state of research in the field and discusses potential governance options moving forward. CONCLUSION: Given that existing governance models are not meeting the challenges of IPE, there is a need to achieve greater alignment between the academic and health service governing systems

Business · Competence (human resources) · Context (archaeology) · Corporate governance · Health care · Interprofessional education · Political science · Public relations · Quality assurance · Service (business) · Service delivery framework · Workforce · Innovations in Medical Education · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

Tools

Open DOI