Factors influencing engagement with digital mental health interventions from the perspective of university students with existing mental health difficulties
A qualitative study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21451922 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alba Madrid-Cagigal (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Leona Ryan (0000-0003-2385-3439, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Carmen Kealy (0000-0001-6373-6494, Health Promotion Research Centre, University of Galway), Jamie Mcnulty (University of Ulster), Maurice Mulvenna (0000-0002-1554-0785, University of Ulster), Molly Byrne (0000-0001-8900-4320, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Margaret M Barry (0000-0002-9464-7176, Health Promotion Research Centre, University of Galway), Gary Donohoe (0000-0003-3037-7426, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-15 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Behaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0144929x.2026.2675626 |
| OpenAlex | W7164339897 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 61 |
University students are experiencing increasing rates of mental health difficulties, and digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer a cost-effective, accessible, and scalable way to support student wellbeing. However, engagement with these interventions is often lower in real-world settings than in research studies. Understanding the factors influencing engagement is therefore essential. This study explored the perspectives of university students with ongoing mental health difficulties regarding their use of and engagement with existing DMHIs. Interviews were conducted between August 2024 and February 2025, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis and then deductively mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors influencing engagement. Four TDF domains were identified as important determinants of engagement: knowledge, beliefs about consequences, goals, and environmental context and resources. Students highlighted limited awareness of available DMHIs, uncertainty regarding their effectiveness, and practical barriers to use. Findings provide important insights into the barriers and facilitators affecting student engagement with DMHIs and suggest that improving awareness, accessibility, and confidence in intervention effectiveness may enhance uptake and sustained engagement among university students experiencing mental health difficulties
Context (archaeology) · Mental health · Perspective (graphical) · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Thematic analysis · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Mental Health Treatment and Access
Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students
Trends in college student mental health and help-seeking by race/ethnicity
Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions
Factors that influence mental health of university and college students in the UK
Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions
Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
Thematic Analysis
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Male involvement in randomised trials testing psychotherapy or behavioural interventions for depression
A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Critical Realism in Discourse Analysis
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research
Promoting Mental Health in School—Young People from Scotland and Sweden Sharing Their Perspectives
Exploring perceptions of psychology students in Delhi-NCR Region towards using mental health apps to promote resilience
No room for reflexivity? Critical reflections following a systematic review of qualitative research
Using thematic analysis in psychology
WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project
Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
Is There a Place for Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|