Toward AI‐literate and genre awareness
Coupling SFL–GBA instruction with ChatGPT in university EFL classrooms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21458530 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Akiko Nagao (0000-0002-7317-6424, Ryukoku University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0155-0640 • E-ISSN: 1833-7139 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/aral.25103.nag |
| OpenAlex | W7167736198 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 60 |
Research on artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted rewriting activities in Systemic Functional Linguistics–Genre-Based Approach (SFL–GBA) L2 writing remains limited. In this study, revision tasks using ChatGPT were embedded into a 15-week SFL–GBA writing class at a university in Japan. EFL learners wrote pre-essays in the discussion genre within a time limit and then revised the same text using ChatGPT. Their experiences were collected through a post-essay questionnaire on how ChatGPT prompted them, how well they understood the feedback, and how they felt about using it again. Pre- essay and post-revision drafts were explored to understand their selected SFL resources, including changes in the uses of Nominalization, Attribution, and theme patterns. Low-proficiency first-year students tended to use ChatGPT for local substitutions, while high-proficiency first-year students were more likely to seek guidance on word choice and genre direction. Second-year university students used ChatGPT more selectively for sentence restructuring and phrasing refinement. While EFL learners’ evaluations of the feedback were generally positive, their willingness to continue using ChatGPT varied across groups and seemed to be related to their perceptions of the clarity of the feedback. Revised drafts illustrated a gradual shift toward a more academic register with higher lexical density and more nominalizations. Changes in the use of interpersonal positioning and the use of contrasting themes to organize counterarguments were also identified
Academic writing · CLARITY · Interpersonal communication · Restructuring · Sentence · Systemic functional linguistics · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification
Genre and Literacy-Modeling Context in Educational Linguistics
The Language of Evaluation
Writing Science
Appraising Research
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning
Beyond modality and hedging
Genre and language learning
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Meaning-oriented understanding of L2 academic writing development with task-type repetition
Potentials and Implications of ChatGPT for ESL Writing Instruction
Using AI-text generated mentor texts for genre-based pedagogy in second language writing
A measure of EFL argumentative writing cognitive load
Action research in education
ChatGPT in the higher education
Working memory and second language writing
Genre-based teaching cycle and instructional design for teaching texts and mandated curriculum contents
Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals
Using ‘Reading to Learn’ (R2L) pedagogy to teach discussion genre to non-Chinese-speaking students in Hong Kong
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT
Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing
Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research
Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained
Incorporating ChatGPT Into Genre‐Based Instruction for Argumentative Writing Among EFL College Students
Innovations in teaching L2 writing
Meaning-making in English-medium instruction science classroom interaction
Mixed Methods Research
Marked Themes and thematic patterns in abstracts, advertisements and administrative documents
| Highly cited | No |
|---|