Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond Belief

On Disinformation and Manipulation

Bibliographic Data

ID21461640
AuthorsKeith Raymond Harris (0000-0002-2278-9028, Ruhr University Bochum, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume90
Issue2
Pages483-503
Publication date2025-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueErkenntnis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0165-0106 • E-ISSN: 1572-8420
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10670-023-00710-6
OpenAlexW4382752644
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited67

Existing analyses of disinformation tend to embrace the view that disinformation is intended or otherwise functions to mislead its audience, that is, to produce false beliefs. I argue that this view is doubly mistaken. First, while paradigmatic disinformation campaigns aim to produce false beliefs in an audience, disinformation may in some cases be intended only to prevent its audience from forming true beliefs. Second, purveyors of disinformation need not intend to have any effect at all on their audience’s beliefs, aiming instead to manipulate an audience’s behavior through alteration of sub-doxastic states. Ultimately, I argue that attention to such non-paradigmatic forms of disinformation is essential to understanding the threat disinformation poses and why this threat is so difficult to counter

Disinformation · Epistemology · Internet privacy · Ontology · Political science · Social media · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Fake News

    Open Access•James Owen Weatherall, Cailin O’connor•Philosophy Compass•2024

  • Industrial Distraction

    Open Access•Cailin O’connor, David Peter Wallis Freeborn•Philosophy of Science•2025

  • Modern disinformation and its socio-security connotation

    Open Access•Slobodan Anđelković, Željko Lazić et al.•Zbornik radova Filozofskog…•2026

  • Disinformation is for degrading the value of information, not confirming falsehoods

    Open Access•Clayton Littlejohn•Philosophical Studies•2026

  • Where conspiracy theories come from, what they do, and what to do about them

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Inquiry•2025

  • The power of second-order conspiracies

    Open Access•Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier•Inquiry•2025

  • How to Be a Meta-Conspiracy Theorist

    Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier•Social Epistemology•2026

  • Moderating Synthetic Content

    Open Access•Sarah A Fisher, John W Howard et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2024

  • Higher-order misinformation

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Synthese•2024

  • Something AI Should Tell You – The Case for Labelling Synthetic Content

    Open Access•Sarah A Fisher•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

  • The Philosophy of Information

    Luciano Floridi•The philosophy of information•2011

  • Lying, Misleading, and What is Said

    Jennifer Saul, Jennifer Mather Saul•Lying Misleading And What Is Said…•2012

  • Alief in Action (and Reaction)

    Open Access•Tamar Szabó Gendler•Mind & Language•2008

  • Bald‐faced Lies! Lying Without the Intent to Deceive

    Open Access•R Sorensen•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2007

  • Fake News and Partisan Epistemology

    Regina Rini•Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal•2017

  • What Is Lying?

    Don Fallis, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2009

  • The Intent to Deceive

    Roderick M Chisholm, Thomas D Feehan et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•1977

  • Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • The Original Sin of Cognition

    Sarah‐jane Leslie, Sarah-Jane Leslie et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2017

  • The Effects of Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populist Ads on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes

    Open Access•Jörg Matthes, Desirée Schmuck•Communication Research•2017

  • Responsible Believers

    Mark Leon, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•2002

  • Alief and Belief

    Tamar Szabó Gendler, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2008

  • Conspiracy Theories, Populism, and Epistemic Autonomy

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Journal of the American…•2023

  • Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation

    Open Access•Zach Bastick•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Fake news

    Thomas Grundmann•Inquiry•2023

  • Aversive Racism

    John F Dovidio, Samuel L Gaertner•Advances in experimental social…•2004

  • The Epistemology of Fake News

    Bennett Holman, Sven Bernecker et al.•Epistemology of Fake News•2021

  • The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model

    Christopher Paul, Miriam Matthews•2016

  • The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism

    Howard Tumber, Silvio Waisbord•Routledge Companion to Media…•2021

  • The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology

    Jules Holroyd, Katherine Puddifoot et al.•Routledge Handbook of Social…•2019

  • Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination

    Marianne Bertrand, Sendhil Mullainathan•American Economic Review•2004

  • Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles

    Open Access•C Thi Nguyen•EPISTÉMÈ•2018

  • Network Propaganda

    Open Access•Yochai Benkler, Yochai Roberts Benkler et al.•Network Propaganda•2018

  • Signals

    Brian Skyrms•Signals•2010

  • What Is Disinformation

    Don Fallis•Library trends•2015

  • Post-Truth

    Lee Mcintyre, Lee C Mcintyre•Post-Truth•2018

  • On Bullshit

    Harry G Frankfurt•On Bullshit•2005

  • Associative and propositional processes in evaluation

    Bertram Gawronski, Galen V Bodenhausen•Psychological Bulletin•2006

  • Epistemic Obligations

    Richard Feldman•Philosophical Perspectives•1988

  • The disinformation order

    Open Access•W L Bennett, Steven Livingston•European Journal of Communication•2018

  • Modelling collective belief

    Open Access•Margaret Gilbert•Synthese•1987

  • A unified account of information, misinformation, and disinformation

    Open Access•Sille Obelitz Søe•Synthese•2021

  • Generics

    Sarah‐jane Leslie, Sarah-Jane Leslie•The Philosophical Review•2008

  • The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform

    Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler et al.•Medical Care•2013

  • Spontaneous prejudice in context

    Bernd Wittenbrink, Charles M Judd et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • The Elusive Backfire Effect

    Open Access•Thomas J Wood, Thomas Wood et al.•Political Behavior•2019

  • Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Andrew Gue et al.•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • The police officer's dilemma

    Joshua Correll, B Park et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • The Influence of Vaccine-critical Websites on Perceiving Vaccination Risks

    Open Access•Cornelia Betsch, Frank Renkewitz et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2010

  • Measuring the impact of Covid-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA

    Open Access•Sahil Loomba, Antero De Figueiredo et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

Unique citing works10
Citations per year5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae