Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform

Bibliographic Data

ID9103581
AuthorsBrendan Nyhan (0000-0001-7497-1799, Dartmouth College, corresponding author), Jason Reifler (0000-0002-1116-7346, Georgia State University), Peter A Ubel (0000-0001-8218-519X)
Year2013
Volume51
Issue2
Pages127-132
Publication date2013-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e318279486b
PMID23211778
OpenAlexW2323316584
LanguageEN
Citations received118
References cited14

CONTEXT: Misperceptions are a major problem in debates about health care reform and other controversial health issues. METHODS: We conducted an experiment to determine if more aggressive media fact-checking could correct the false belief that the Affordable Care Act would create "death panels." Participants from an opt-in Internet panel were randomly assigned to either a control group in which they read an article on Sarah Palin's claims about "death panels" or an intervention group in which the article also contained corrective information refuting Palin. FINDINGS: The correction reduced belief in death panels and strong opposition to the reform bill among those who view Palin unfavorably and those who view her favorably but have low political knowledge. However, it backfired among politically knowledgeable Palin supporters, who were more likely to believe in death panels and to strongly oppose reform if they received the correction. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the difficulty of reducing misperceptions about health care reform among individuals with the motivation and sophistication to reject corrective information

Health care · Health care reform · Mythology · Opposition (politics) · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Sophistication · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Healthcare Policy and Management · History · Law · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Health Policy

  • Guerras híbridas e Fake News

    Open Access•Tiago De Moura Soeiro, João Gabriel Nascimento de Araújo et al.•Revista Movimentos Sociais e…•2020

  • Hostile Forces

    Jamie J Gruffydd-Jones•Hostile Forces•2022

  • One Nation, Two Realities

    Morgan Marietta, David C Barker•One Nation, Two Realities•2019

  • Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them

    Joseph E Uscinski•Conspiracy Theories and the…•2018

  • False Alarm

    Open Access•Ethan Porter, Thomas J Wood et al.•False Alarm•2019

  • Retooling Politics

    Open Access•Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero et al.•Retooling Politics•2020

  • Social Media and Democracy

    Open Access•Arye L Hillman, Ronen Gradwohl et al.•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Searching for the backfire effect

    Open Access•Briony Swire-Thompson, Joseph DeGutis et al.•Journal of Applied Research in…•2020

  • Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Benjamin Lyons•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science

    Open Access•Sarah E Krep, Douglas L Kriner•Science Advances•2020

  • Correcting misinformation about climate change

    Open Access•Salil D Benegal, Lyle Scruggs et al.•Climatic Change•2018

  • The Partisan Brain

    Open Access•Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Andrea Pereira•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2018

  • Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • The Argumentative Theory

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2016

  • Is the Affordable Care Act Cultivating a Cross-Class Constituency? Income, Partisanship, and a Proposal for Tracing the Contingent Nature of Positive Policy Feedback Effects

    Jacqueline Chattopadhyay•Journal of Health Politics Policy…•2018

  • Intelligent Democracy

    Judith Benson, Jonathan Benson•Intelligent Democracy•2024

  • When Readers Believe Journalists

    Open Access•Benjamin Lyons•International Journal of Public…•2017

  • Placing Conspiratorial Motives in Context

    Open Access•Joseph E Uscinski•Psychological Reports•2014

  • Chapter 9. Establishing Common Ground

    Open Access•Anthony D Barnosky, Teenie Matlock et al.•Collabra•2016

  • Who believes Trump conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 election? Evidence from a survey experiment

    Joseph E Uscinski, Joseph Uscinski et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2025

  • Obamacare

    Open Access•Álvaro Carrasco-Aguilar, José Javier Galán et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Fact-Checking Interventions on Social Media Using Cartoon Figures

    Michael Opgenhaffen•Digital Journalism•2022

  • Does Third-Party Fact-Checking Increase Trust in News Stories? An Australian Case Study Using the “Sports Rorts” Affair

    Open Access•Andrea Carson, Andrew Gibbons et al.•Digital Journalism•2022

  • AI as an Apolitical Referee

    M Chung, Won-Ki Moon et al.•Digital Journalism•2024

  • Is the Political Slant of Psychology Research Related to Scientific Replicability

    Open Access•Diego A Reinero, Julian Wills et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2020

  • Psychosocial processes and human desire

    Wayne Journell•Journal of Research on Technology…•2024

  • Refusing to meet disinformation halfway

    Troy D Glover•Leisure/Loisir•2026

  • How Misinformation and Rebuttals in Online Comments Affect People’s Intention to Receive Covid-19 Vaccines

    Open Access•Yanqing Sun, Fangcao Lu•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2023

  • Voluntary Exposure to Political Fact Checks

    Open Access•Kyle Mattes, David P Redlawsk•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2020

  • How Single vs. Multiple-Statement Fact-Checking and Partisan Identity Influence Individuals’ Trust in Counter-Attitudinal Political Fact-Checks

    Open Access•Huu Dat Tran, Pham Phuong Uyen Diep et al.•Communication Studies•2026

  • Conspiracy Theories, Resistance to Evidence, and Propaganda

    Open Access•M Giulia Napolitano•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Attitudes towards the inheritance tax

    Open Access•Beatrice Alba, A Vázquez et al.•International Journal of Social…•2025

  • Beyond Belief

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Erkenntnis•2025

  • How Attitudes Impact the Continued Influence Effect of Misinformation

    Open Access•Mark W Susmann, Duane T Wegener•Personality and Social Psychology…•2023

  • Checking the Fact-Checkers

    Open Access•Xingyu Liu, Qi Li et al.•Communication Research•2025

  • Migrant-Family Separation and Higher-Order Laws’ Diverging Normative Force

    Open Access•Kevin L Cope, Charles Crabtree•The Journal of Legal Studies•2022

  • From truth to post-truth

    Andrew Howat•Inquiry•2026

  • Understanding Trump Supporters’ News Use

    Open Access•Sadie Dempsey, J Suk et al.•The Forum•2020

  • Crisis and partisan bias

    Open Access•Hoeun Lee•Asian Journal of Comparative…•2025

  • An inflated view of the facts? How preferences and predispositions shape conspiracy beliefs about the Deflategate scandal

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Brendan Nyhan et al.•Research & Politics•2016

  • Classified or Coverup? The Effect of Redactions on Conspiracy Theory Beliefs

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Franklin Dickinson et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2016

  • How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services

    P B Brandtzaeg, Asbjørn Følstad et al.•Journalism Practice•2017

  • Eyewitness Memory in Journalistic Context

    Robin Blom•Journalism Practice•2022

  • Mediating the Truth

    Mohammad Yousuf•Journalism Practice•2023

  • They See Dead People (Voting)

    Mirya R Holman, J Celeste Lay•Journal of Political Marketing•2018

  • You have to hug, nothing is going to happen”

    Open Access•Rodrigo Castro Cornejo•Latin American Politics and Society•2026

  • Deciding what’s true

    Open Access•Rachel E Moran•New Media & Society•2018

  • Are “they” out to get me? A social identity model of paranoia

    Open Access•Katharine H Greenaway, Alexander Haslam et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2018

  • Correcting Misperceptions

    Open Access•Aart Van Stekelenburg, Gabi Schaap et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Conspiracy or Public Service? Does Facebook’s Third-Party Fact-Checking Increase Conspiracy Beliefs Among Americans

    Open Access•Jason B Phillips, Timothy B Gravelle et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2026

  • Measuring the effect of political alignment, platforms, and fake news consumption on voter concern for election processes

    Open Access•Julia Stachofsky, Ludwig Christian Schaupp et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • I do not believe you

    Emily K Vraga, Leticia Bode•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Biased belief in the Bayesian brain

    Open Access•Ben M Tappin, Stephen Gadsby•Consciousness and Cognition•2019

  • The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions

    Open Access•D J Flynn, Brendan Nyhan et al.•Political Psychology•2017

  • Mobilizing personal narratives

    Filippo Trevisan, Bryan Bello et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2019

  • Walls, Cages, and Family Separation

    Open Access•Sophia Jordán Wallace, Chris Zepeda Millán et al.•Walls, Cages, and Family Separation•2020

  • (Mis)Informed

    Open Access•M Abrajano, N Lajevardi•Informed•2021

  • Navigating Between the Plots

    Open Access•Mathieu Alemany Oliver•Journal of Business Ethics•2020

  • Closing the Perception Gap

    Open Access•Elina Lindgren, Nora Theorin et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2026

  • Bearing witness to asylum seekers in an era of misinformation

    Open Access•Pauline White Meeusen•Law & Society Review•2026

  • Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories in Venezuela

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•Latin American Research Review•2019

  • Men’s and Women’s Gender-Role Attitudes across the Transition to Parenthood

    Open Access•F Perales, Y Jarallah et al.•Social Forces•2018

  • Fighting Misperceptions and Doubting Journalists’ Objectivity

    Open Access•Sakari Nieminen, Lauri Rapeli•Political Studies Review•2019

  • Combler le fossé. L’avenir des recherches sur les théories du complot

    Michael Butter, Peter Knight et al.•Diogène•2016

  • Making them pay

    Open Access•Sarah E Croco, Jared Mcdonald et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Identity and Epistemic Emotions During Knowledge Revision

    Greg Trevors, Gregory J Trevors et al.•Discourse Processes•2016

  • Effects of Text Content and Beliefs on Informal Argument Evaluation

    Michael B Wolfe, Todd J Williams•Discourse Processes•2017

  • Aged communities and health-care reform attitudes in the United States of America

    Open Access•Brittany H Bramlett•Ageing and Society•2017

  • Stubborn emotions, stubborn beliefs

    Open Access•Kate Pendoley•Synthese•2023

  • Covid‐19 and Motivated Reasoning

    Open Access•Sylvester•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Is belief superiority justified by superior knowledge

    Open Access•Michael P Hall, Kaitlin T Raimi•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • The hidden appeal and aversion to political conspiracies as revealed in the response dynamics of partisans

    Open Access•Nicholas D Duran, Stephen P Nicholson et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017

  • Do Corrective Effects Last? Results from a Longitudinal Experiment on Beliefs Toward Immigration in the U.S

    Open Access•Dustin Carnahan, Daniel E Bergan et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • The Effect of Fact‐Checking on Elites

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Economists and Public Opinion

    Christian D Johnston, Christopher D Johnston et al.•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • The Rationalizing Voter

    Brendan Nyhan•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Conspiratorial Thinking and Political Constraint

    Open Access•Adam M Enders•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Why Can’t We Agree on ID? Partisanship, Perceptions of Fraud, and Public Support for Voter Identification Laws

    John V Kane•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • The Covid-19 Infodemic and the Efficacy of Interventions Intended to Reduce Misinformation

    Open Access•Sarah E Krep, Douglas L Kriner•Public Opinion Quarterly•2022

  • Diversity, Trust, and Social Learning in Collaborative Governance

    Open Access•Saba Siddiki, Jangmin Kim et al.•Public Administration Review•2017

  • Partisan Disagreements Arising from Rationalization of Common Information

    Open Access•Benjamin E Lauderdale•Political Science Research and…•2016

  • What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions

    Open Access•Joseph E Uscinski, Casey Klofstad et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections

    Open Access•Ullrich K H Ecker, Li Chang Ang•Political Psychology•2019

  • Learning Facts About Migration

    Open Access•Konstantin Glinitzer, Tobias Gummer et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation

    Open Access•Myrto Pantazi, Scott Hale et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan, Asheley R Landrum et al.•Political Psychology•2017

  • Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire

    Kim Fridkin, Patrick J Kenney et al.•Political Communication•2015

  • Fact-Checking

    Nathan Walter, Jonathan Cohen et al.•Political Communication•2020

  • The Partisan Origins of Economic Perceptions in a Weak Party System

    Open Access•Hoeun Lee, Matthew Singer•Political Behavior•2022

  • Self-Awareness of Political Knowledge

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham•Political Behavior•2020

  • The Elusive Backfire Effect

    Open Access•Thomas J Wood, Thomas Wood et al.•Political Behavior•2019

  • Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • The Politics of Attributing Blame for Cyberattacks and the Costs of Uncertainty

    Open Access•Marcus Schulzke•Perspectives on Politics•2018

  • Platforms, Politics, and the Crisis of Democracy

    Open Access•W L Bennett, Steven Livingston•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Motivated Reasoning about Public Performance

    Oliver James, Gregg G Van Ryzin•Journal of Public Administration…•2017

  • Expectations, vote choice and opinion stability since the 2016 Brexit referendum

    Open Access•Charlotte Grynberg, Stefanie Walter et al.•European Union Politics•2020

  • Can deliberation neutralise power

    Open Access•Samuel Bagg•European Journal of Political…•2018

  • Citizens and Condemnation

    Open Access•Jamie J Gruffydd-Jones•Comparative Political Studies•2019

  • The communist imaginary in Indonesia’s 2014 and 2019 presidential elections

    Open Access•Rendy Wadipalapa, Rendy Pahrun Wadipalapa•Asian Journal of Political Science•2023

  • Partisan Bias in Surveys

    John G Bullock, Gabriel S Lenz et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • What Americans know about politics and why it matters

    Michael X Delli Carpini•What Americans know about…•1996

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Biased Assimilation, Attitude Polarization, and Affect in Reactions to Stereotype-Relevant Scientific Information

    Open Access•Geoffrey D Munro, Peter H Ditto•Personality and Social Psychology…•1997

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • Understanding Interaction Models

    Open Access•Thomas Brambor, William R Clark et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments

    Kari Edwards, Edward E Smith•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • Biased assimilation and attitude polarization

    Charles G Lord, Lee Ro et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

Unique citing works118
Citations per year9,83
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 117

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae