Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Crafting the Virtuous Corporation Through Spiritual Discernment

Bibliographic Data

ID21464639
AuthorsSharda S Nandram (0000-0003-2090-3840, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Puneet K Bindlish (0000-0001-5026-2648, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Raysa Geaquinto Rocha (0000-0002-6542-1397, University of Essex, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume205
Issue1
Pages71-94
Publication date2026-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Business Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-4544 • E-ISSN: 1573-0697
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10551-025-06075-w
OpenAlexW4413064659
LanguageEN
References cited78

This study explores spiritual discernment through the lenses of modern virtue ethics in organizational decision-making by developing a process model grounded in empirical research at Buurtzorg Nederland, a Dutch home care organization. Drawing on MacIntyre’s virtue ethics and Moore’s concept of virtuous corporate character, we identify six principles (serving, attuning, trusting, needing, rethinking, and common sense) and six manifestations (meaningless, meaningful, mindless and mindful organizing activities, substantive rationality, and love for craftsmanship) that facilitate the development of virtuous corporate character. Our findings demonstrate how spiritual discernment enables organizations to balance internal goods (e.g., excellence in practice) with external goods (e.g., reputation and profit). The resulting Process Model of Spiritual Discernment in Organizing Activities contributes to business ethics by empirically grounding Moore’s concept of the virtuous institutional character and Weber’s substantive rationality, providing practical guidance for managers seeking to transcend the means-ends dichotomy

Business ethics · Corporation · Discernment · Economics · Epistemology · Management · Political science · Rationality · Sociology · Virtue · Virtue ethics · Law · Management Theory and Practice · Philosophy · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Workplace Spirituality and Leadership

  • Organizational Preferences and Their Consequences

    Open Access•Deborah H Gruenfeld, Larissa Z Tiedens•Handbook of Social Psychology•2010

  • Dignity at Work

    Open Access•Randy Hodson•Dignity at Work•2001

  • Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science

    J Pfeffer•Academy of Management Review•1993

  • The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work

    Open Access•Douglas R May, Richard L Gilson et al.•Journal of Occupational and…•2004

  • Beyond Self-Management

    Bradley L Kirkman, Benson Rosen•Academy of Management Journal•1999

  • Discriminating Between ‘Meaningful Work’ and the ‘Management of Meaning’

    Open Access•Marjolein Lips‐wiersma, Marjolein Lips-Wiersma et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2009

  • Significant Work Is About Self-Realization and Broader Purpose

    Open Access•Frank Martela, Anne Birgitta Pessi•Frontiers in Psychology•2018

  • What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    Open Access•Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Strategic Organization•2021

  • Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt, Melissa E Graebner et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2016

  • Building Theories from Case Study Research

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Academy of Management Review•1989

  • Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking

    Karl E Weick, Kathleen M Sutcliffe et al.•Organization Science•2005

  • The reflective practitioner

    Donald A Schon•The reflective practitioner•1991

  • The Problem of Autonomy

    Open Access•Nisigandha Bhuyan, Arunima Chakraborty•Journal of Business Ethics•2024

  • Organizational Spirituality

    Open Access•Raysa Geaquinto Rocha, Paulo Pinheiro•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • Recovering Aristotle’s Practice-Based Ontology

    Open Access•Sylvia D’souza, Lucas D Introna•Journal of Business Ethics•2024

  • What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work

    Open Access•Frank Martela, Marcos Gómez et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2021

  • Language differences in qualitative research

    Open Access•Fenna van Nes, Tineke Abma et al.•European Journal of Ageing•2010

  • Moral mazes

    Open Access•Robert Jackall•International Journal of Politics…•1988

  • The Informed Will and the Meaning of Life

    John Kekes•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1986

  • Exploring the Relationships between Organizational Virtuousness and Performance

    Open Access•Kim S Cameron, David S Bright et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2004

  • The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis

    Barney G Glaser•Social Problems•1965

  • Qualitative Quality

    Open Access•Sarah J Tracy•Qualitative Inquiry•2010

  • Max Weber's Types of Rationality

    Stephen Kalberg•American Journal of Sociology•1980

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae