Development and validation of the Teacher Rating Scale of Reflective Ability for three-to-six-year-old preschoolers in China / Desarrollo y validación de la Escala de Evaluación de la Capacidad de Reflexión de los preescolares chinos de tres a seis años para el profesorado de EP en China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21479517 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yu Gong (0000-0002-8847-1047, Hangzhou Normal University), Yunpeng Wu (0000-0001-8414-9205, Dezhou University, corresponding author), Yali Dong (0009-0008-3324-9853, Hangzhou Normal University), Liping Qin (0000-0002-3270-8607, Dezhou University), Jianfen Wu (0000-0003-3578-0484, Hangzhou Normal University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 925-959 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0210-3702 • E-ISSN: 1578-4126 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02103702251383609 |
| OpenAlex | W4416625413 |
| Language | ES |
| References cited | 17 |
This study aimed to develop and validate the Teacher Rating Scale of Reflective Ability (TRSRA) for preschoolers aged three to six. The initial development involved interviews, observations and questionnaires, resulting in a scale with two dimensions and 11 indicators. Stratified random sampling selected 1,036 preschoolers from kindergartens in Zhejiang Province, China ( M age = 63.62 months, SD = 10.66; 46.81% boys). The TRSRA demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .90 to .96) and confirmatory factor analysis supported its construct validity. Inter-rater reliability was acceptable ( r s = .64 to .66, p r s = .80 to .83, p r s = .68 to .83, p
Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Internal consistency · Metacognition · Rating scale · Stratified sampling · Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Reflective Practices in Education
How we think.
Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking
Empathy and the Self-Absorption Paradox II
From a distance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|