Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Development and validation of the Teacher Rating Scale of Reflective Ability for three-to-six-year-old preschoolers in China / Desarrollo y validación de la Escala de Evaluación de la Capacidad de Reflexión de los preescolares chinos de tres a seis años para el profesorado de EP en China

Bibliographic Data

ID21479517
AuthorsYu Gong (0000-0002-8847-1047, Hangzhou Normal University), Yunpeng Wu (0000-0001-8414-9205, Dezhou University, corresponding author), Yali Dong (0009-0008-3324-9853, Hangzhou Normal University), Liping Qin (0000-0002-3270-8607, Dezhou University), Jianfen Wu (0000-0003-3578-0484, Hangzhou Normal University)
Year2025
Volume48
Issue4
Pages925-959
Publication date2025-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0210-3702 • E-ISSN: 1578-4126
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/02103702251383609
OpenAlexW4416625413
LanguageES
References cited17

This study aimed to develop and validate the Teacher Rating Scale of Reflective Ability (TRSRA) for preschoolers aged three to six. The initial development involved interviews, observations and questionnaires, resulting in a scale with two dimensions and 11 indicators. Stratified random sampling selected 1,036 preschoolers from kindergartens in Zhejiang Province, China ( M age = 63.62 months, SD = 10.66; 46.81% boys). The TRSRA demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .90 to .96) and confirmatory factor analysis supported its construct validity. Inter-rater reliability was acceptable ( r s = .64 to .66, p r s = .80 to .83, p r s = .68 to .83, p

Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Internal consistency · Metacognition · Rating scale · Stratified sampling · Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Reflective Practices in Education

  • How we think.

    John Dewey•1910

  • Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

    Domenic V Cicchetti•Psychological Assessment•1994

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking

    David Kember, Doris Y P Leung et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2000

  • Empathy and the Self-Absorption Paradox II

    Jeff Joireman•Self and Identity•2004

  • From a distance

    Ozlem Ayduk, Ethan Kro et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae