Aligning evaluation approaches with context
Reductionism, system thinking, and pragmatic synthesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21485085 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Huey T Chen (0000-0002-9429-8885, Department of Public Health, Mercer University - Atlanta Campus, Atlanta, USA, corresponding author), Liliana Morosanu (Department of Public Health, Mercer University - Atlanta Campus, Atlanta, USA), Victor H Chen (0000-0002-2598-0573, Management, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 540-551 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asia Pacific Journal of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0218-8791 • E-ISSN: 1742-6855 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02188791.2024.2390657 |
| OpenAlex | W4403280126 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 26 |
The Campbellian validity typology has been used as a foundation for outcome evaluation and for developing evidence-based interventions for decades. As such, randomized control trials were preferred for outcome evaluation. However, some evaluators disagree with the validity typology’s argument that randomized controlled trials as the best design for outcome evaluation, and with its strategy to maximize internal validity at the expense of external validity. The debates over these issues have been ongoing and intensive. This paper proposes a fresh idea for approaches to address this controversy, by bringing problem-solving philosophies into discussions. Three problem-solving philosophies have been used to develop intervention programs: reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis. This paper argues the validity typology is appropriate for evaluating reductionism-based programs only, but not systems thinking- or pragmatic synthesis-based programs. Mismatched applications of research designs in evaluation are sources of confusion and controversies. This insight indicates a pressing need for developing evaluation theories and approaches for systems thinking and pragmatic synthesis. Because the majority of community programs are pragmatic synthesis-based programs, this paper devotes to developing such solutions
Cognitive science · Epistemology · Geography · Management science · Reductionism · Sociology · Systems thinking · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Philosophy · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
The Structure of Science
Standards of Evidence
Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research
The Cultural Adaptation of Prevention Interventions
Randomised controlled trials – the gold standard for effectiveness research
HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing among Injection Drug Users in South China
Theory-Driven Approach for Facilitation of Planning Health Promotion or Other Programs
Randomized controlled trials
Fidelity Criteria
Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice
Efficacy vs Effectiveness Trial Results of an Indicated “Model” Substance Abuse Program
Therapeutic Songwriting in Music Therapy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|