How to be absolutely fair Part II
Philosophy meets economics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21498969 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stefan Wintein (0000-0002-1394-9704, Erasmus University Rotterdam, corresponding author), Conrad Heilmann (0000-0003-1007-4372, Erasmus University Rotterdam) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 650-672 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economics and Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0266-2671 • E-ISSN: 1474-0028 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s026626712300041x |
| OpenAlex | W4391647911 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 28 |
In the article ‘How to be absolutely fair, Part I: the Fairness formula’, we presented the first theory of comparative and absolute fairness. Here, we relate the implications of our Fairness formula to economic theories of fair division. Our analysis makes contributions to both philosophy and economics: to the philosophical literature, we add an axiomatic discussion of proportionality and fairness. To the economic literature, we add an appealing normative theory of absolute and comparative fairness that can be used to evaluate axioms and division rules. Also, we provide a novel definition and characterization of the absolute priority rule
Axiom · Axiomatic system · Economics · Epistemology · Fair division · Mathematical economics · Normative · Political science · Positive economics · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
Theories of Fairness and Aggregation
To be fair
Fairness
V—Fairness
How to be absolutely fair Part I
Weighing Up Weighted Lotteries
Good, Fairness and Qalys
Fairness Between Competing Claims
Fairness and Aggregation
On Fairness and Claims
Fairness and the Strengths of Agents’ Claims
Broome's Theory of Fairness and the Problem of Quantifying the Strengths of Claims
The three musketeers
A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
How to be fairer
Treating Broome Fairly
Broome on Fairness and Lotteries
Dividing the indivisible
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |