Studying the effectiveness of an online argumentation model for improving undergraduate students' argumentation ability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21499388 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ya‐Ching Fan (0000-0001-9457-6489, Graduate Institute of Education Providence University Taichung Taiwan), Tzu‐Hua Wang (0000-0002-4085-9851, Department of Education and Learning Technology National Tsing Hua University Hsinchu Taiwan, corresponding author), Kuo‐Hua Wang (Graduate Institute of Science Education National Changhua University of Education Changhua Taiwan) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 526-539 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0266-4909 • E-ISSN: 1365-2729 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jcal.12420 |
| OpenAlex | W3007388112 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 32 |
This research develops a web‐based model, entitled the “intuitive claim, peer‐assessment, discussion, and elaborate claim argumentation training” (IPadE) model, and embeds with a Web‐based Interactive Argumentation System to enhance undergraduate students' socioscientific argumentation abilities. This research adopts a quasi‐experimental research design; the sample comprised 131 undergraduate students from two classes (69 in the experimental group and 62 in the control group). The socioscientific issue discussed were related to global health. This study collected and analysed quantitative and qualitative data, including the pretest and posttest of students' knowledge test scores and argumentation abilities questionnaire. The results generally confirmed the effectiveness of the IPadE model. First, in a comparison of the content knowledge and argumentation skills, the experimental group have statistically significantly improved than the control group. Second, regarding the number of reasoning modes proposed, the experimental group could propose multiple reasoning modes and reasoning levels on rebuttals increased after training
Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Online discussion · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Research on information searching strategies in high school students’ quality of argumentative essay writing
“Learn to Argue” and “Argue to Learn”
Scientific habits of arguing minds
Promoting Argumentation Skills Among University Students
Systematically reviewing the potential of scientific argumentation to promote multidimensional conceptual change in science education
Technology‐Embedded Argument‐DrivenInquiry in Preservice Chemistry Teacher Education
Online formative peer feedback in Chinese contexts at the tertiary Level
Examining the interdependence in the growth of students' language and argument competencies in replicative and generative learning environments
Students' abilities to formulate exhaustive titles as a key to comprehending arguments
Exploring the effects of online peer feedback on tertiary students’ peer feedback literacy in English writing
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |