Journal of Medical Ethics turns 50
A mixed-methods study about the future of medical ethics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21514418 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Goh (Imperial College London), Ruth Shien Goh (0009-0003-0649-9121, Imperial College London, corresponding author), Ruth Bromley (0009-0004-2363-4628, Division of Medical Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK), Libby Frith (0000-0002-8506-0699, Centre for Social Ethics & Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | jme-2025-111649 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2025-111649 |
| PMID | 41807062 |
| OpenAlex | W7134953878 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
The Journal of Medical Ethics celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2025. This milestone created the opportunity for reflection on how the journal and, more broadly, the field of medical ethics has changed, and what the future should look like. To do this, we explored the views of attendees at the Institute of Medical Ethics (IME) annual conference in 2025 on the future of medical ethics. Our study aims to shed light on: (1) the aspects of today’s ethical landscape in need of greater attention; (2) the contemporary factors that are likely to shape the future of medical ethics; and (3) the role that medical ethics should play in healthcare and related fields in the future. We conducted a mixed-methods study. The study consisted of a questionnaire that included both quantitative and qualitative elements, and a small number of participants attended an explorative focus group. A total of n=53 survey responses were included in the final sample, and n=9 individuals participated in our focus group. Our findings highlight the need to account for relationality in medical ethics, and identified emerging technologies as a cause of future ethical complexity. Moreover, our findings support the need for a decolonised and more inclusive medical ethics. We also explore what medical ethics education should look like in the future
Bioethics · Ethical issues · Focus group · Medical ethics · Medical research · Milestone · Qualitative research · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Innovations in Medical Education
Law's Relations
Vulnerability as a key concept in relational patient- centered professionalism
Perennial issues and current controversies
Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
A systematic scoping review of undergraduate medical ethics education programs from 1990 to 2020
Thematic Analysis
Feminist relational theory
Decolonising with imperial tools? The paradox of a global bioethics library
Using thematic analysis in psychology
How digital technologies become embedded in family life across generations
How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes
| Highly cited | No |
|---|