‘Good’ evaluation
Methodological diversity may be empress, but sound methods remain queen
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21518457 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Betty Onyura (0000-0001-8893-8260, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Toronto Ontario Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 656-658 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-0110 • E-ISSN: 1365-2923 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/medu.15374 |
| PMID | 38503325 |
| OpenAlex | W4392971412 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
Betty_EvalEd argues it's not enough to simply value evaluation methodology as the gauge that indicates when our “needle” is shifting. We must also monitor the quality & operations of the gauge itself
Acoustics · Biology · Sociology · Anthropology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Innovations in Medical Education · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Ecology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |