What are the key capabilities needed by university teachers and are these embedded in existing frameworks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21522460 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ieva Stupans (0000-0002-8193-6905, RMIT University, corresponding author), Brendan O’Connell (0000-0001-6152-7162, RMIT University), Brendan T O’Connell, Margaret Jollands (0000-0002-4136-1289, RMIT University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 2689-2703 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Australian Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0311-6999 • E-ISSN: 2210-5328 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s13384-025-00831-7 |
| OpenAlex | W4409462383 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
This study aims to identify the key capabilities needed by university teachers and to examine the extent to which current university frameworks specify and define standards for these skills. This paper is based on extensive literature review and comparative study of individual university frameworks utilising a comparative document analysis. Our key findings are that there is a diverse range of capabilities cited across the literature but only a weak consensus in the frameworks about the key skills and future focused capabilities needed by university teachers. We also find that very few frameworks define levels of performance, and they are prescriptive, with a focus on competence rather than capabilities. Our findings reveal that the available frameworks lack utility for capability development because most lack guidance on definitions of what knowledge, skills and attributes university teachers need to be effective in their roles. Thus, we provide insights into these critical but relatively unstudied issues
Computer security · Engineering ethics · Engineering management · Process management · Computer Science · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Engineering · Innovative Education and Learning Practices · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
A Conceptual Review of Positive Teacher Interpersonal Communication Behaviors in the Instructional Context
The Standard Definition of Creativity
Impacts of Covid-19 on primary, secondary and tertiary education
A scoping review of Future Skills frameworks
Education and the Covid-19 pandemic
New Technology and Professional Work
Professional competence standards and frameworks in the United Kingdom
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Reimagining career education with the future senses
Can Serious Games Contribute to Developing and Sustaining 21st Century Skills
| Highly cited | No |
|---|