Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What are the key capabilities needed by university teachers and are these embedded in existing frameworks

Bibliographic Data

ID21522460
AuthorsIeva Stupans (0000-0002-8193-6905, RMIT University, corresponding author), Brendan O’Connell (0000-0001-6152-7162, RMIT University), Brendan T O’Connell, Margaret Jollands (0000-0002-4136-1289, RMIT University)
Year2025
Volume52
Issue3
Pages2689-2703
Publication date2025-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Australian Educational Researcher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0311-6999 • E-ISSN: 2210-5328
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s13384-025-00831-7
OpenAlexW4409462383
LanguageEN
References cited38

This study aims to identify the key capabilities needed by university teachers and to examine the extent to which current university frameworks specify and define standards for these skills. This paper is based on extensive literature review and comparative study of individual university frameworks utilising a comparative document analysis. Our key findings are that there is a diverse range of capabilities cited across the literature but only a weak consensus in the frameworks about the key skills and future focused capabilities needed by university teachers. We also find that very few frameworks define levels of performance, and they are prescriptive, with a focus on competence rather than capabilities. Our findings reveal that the available frameworks lack utility for capability development because most lack guidance on definitions of what knowledge, skills and attributes university teachers need to be effective in their roles. Thus, we provide insights into these critical but relatively unstudied issues

Computer security · Engineering ethics · Engineering management · Process management · Computer Science · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Engineering · Innovative Education and Learning Practices · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods

  • A Conceptual Review of Positive Teacher Interpersonal Communication Behaviors in the Instructional Context

    Open Access•Fei Xie, Ali Derakhshan•Frontiers in Psychology•2021

  • The Standard Definition of Creativity

    Mark A Runco, Garrett J Jaeger•Creativity Research Journal•2012

  • Impacts of Covid-19 on primary, secondary and tertiary education

    Open Access•Kuok Ho Daniel Tang•Educational Research for Policy…•2023

  • A scoping review of Future Skills frameworks

    Open Access•Athanasia Kotsiou, D D Fajardo-Tovar et al.•Irish Educational Studies•2022

  • Education and the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Sir John Daniel, James Ducharme•Prospects•2020

  • New Technology and Professional Work

    Open Access•Stan Lester•Professions and Professionalism•2020

  • Professional competence standards and frameworks in the United Kingdom

    Stan Lester•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2014

  • Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

    Open Access•Glenn A Bowen•Qualitative Research Journal•2009

  • Reimagining career education with the future senses

    Open Access•Marguerite Westacott•On the Horizon The International…•2022

  • Can Serious Games Contribute to Developing and Sustaining 21st Century Skills

    Open Access•Margarida Romero, Mireia Usart et al.•Games and Culture•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae