ChatGPT and university teaching, learning and assessment
Some initial reflections on teaching academic integrity in the age of Large Language Models
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21530602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adrian Kirwan (0000-0002-0771-3092, Critical Skills, Office of the Dean of Teaching and Learning, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1389-1406 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Irish Educational Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0332-3315 • E-ISSN: 1747-4965 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03323315.2023.2284901 |
| OpenAlex | W4388967406 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 27 |
Since its arrival in late 2022, ChatGPT has occupied the minds of academics, administrators and students. Reactions to the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) have varied but significant anxieties about their impact on assessment have arisen. To address these concerns, this article serves three purposes; firstly, it seeks to gauge the discourse surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) focusing on ChatGPT. In doing so, it explores general and academic responses to the technology and the challenges/opportunities that have been identified. Secondly, and building on this, it provides an overview of ChatGPT in action and seeks to moderate fears raised by some of the extreme claims that have been made about the potential of this technology. Finally, the article uses a case study to discuss the introduction of this technology to a group of first-year undergraduate students, offering guidance on how the topic of LLMs might be broached. It concludes by suggesting that while the technology has the ability to offer assistance in the completion of academic assessment, it does not replace the higher thinking skills that are central to teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. In turn, arguing that these must be central to assessment practices
Academic integrity · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Psychology · Social Psychology
Artificial intelligence in higher education
Profile of EFL Learners’ AI‐Mediated Informal Digital Learning of English, Digital Nativity, Desire, and Online Self‐Efficacy
Generative AI Tools in Higher Education
Revisiting the Ethical Boundaries and Disclosure Practices of AI-infused Academic Writing
Clashing AIs
Surging currents
Probing university teachers’ self-study experiences
ChatGPT User Experience
The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT
Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers
ChatGPT
AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry?
Chatting and cheating
Functions of innovation systems
How Users Matter
ChatGPT
Coded conduct
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |