Stakeholders’ insights on learning analytics
Perspectives of students and staff
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21538699 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geraldine Gray (0000-0002-9694-2558, Technological University Dublin, corresponding author), Ana Elena Schalk (0000-0002-2317-9117, Technological University Dublin), Gordon Cooke (0000-0002-4659-4524, Technological University Dublin), Phelim Murnion (Atlantic Technological University), Pauline Rooney (0000-0002-8759-6091, Trinity College Dublin), K C O'Rourke (0000-0002-3807-3403, Technological University Dublin) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 187 |
| Pages | 104550 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Computers & Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0360-1315 • E-ISSN: 1873-782X |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104550 |
| OpenAlex | W4281674412 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 17 |
Learning analytics has drawn the attention of academics and administrators in recent years as a tool to better understand students' needs and to tailor appropriate and timely responses. While many value the potential of learning analytics, it is not without critics, especially with regards to ethical concerns surrounding the level and type of data gathered, and scepticism on data's ability to measure something useful and actionable. This paper gathers the thoughts of key stakeholders, including staff and students, and their expectations of learning analytics, their priorities for using student data, and how they should be supported to act on the data, with the aim of aiding institutions with their plans to implement learning analytics. For this analysis we explored stakeholder awareness, concerns, priorities and support needs with respect to effectively accessing, interpreting and utilising learning data through the use of surveys and focus groups. These were adapted from the previously published SHEILA framework protocols with additional topics added relating to awareness, uses of data, and support. The focus groups were used to capture prevalent themes, followed by surveys to gain perspectives on these themes from a wider stakeholder audience. Overall, results suggest there are significant differences in the perspectives of each of the stakeholders. There is also a strong need for both additional training and ongoing support to manage and realise stakeholder understanding and goals around learning analytics. Further research is necessary to explore the needs of a greater diversity of stakeholders
Analytics · Big data · Business · Data science · Focus group · Knowledge management · Learning analytics · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Computer Science · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology · Marketing
Learning during Covid-19
Developing an Early Warning System with Personalized Interventions to Enhance Academic Outcomes for At-Risk Students in Taiwanese Higher Education
A needs analysis for institutional analytics
Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review
Curriculum analytics adoption in higher education
Inclusion or infringement? A systematic research review of students' perspectives on student privacy in technology‐enhanced, hybrid and online courses
Understanding Correlation
Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics
The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education
The scalable implementation of predictive learning analytics at a distance learning university
A four-country cross-case analysis of academic staff expectations about learning analytics in higher education
Assessing the validity of a learning analytics expectation instrument
A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics
Learning Analytics
Learning Analytics Dashboard Applications
Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |