Ašhab b. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz (m. 204/820) et l’évolution du maḏhab mālikite (iiie-vie/Ixe-xiie siècle)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21586111 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clément Salah (0000-0002-7846-4054, Sorbonne Université (UMR 8167) / Université de Lausanne (IHAR), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 392-441 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-28 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Islamic Law and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0928-9380 • E-ISSN: 1568-5195 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15685195-bja10040 |
| OpenAlex | W4362561371 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 1 |
Although recognized as an important legal authority in the formative period of Mālikī legal doctrine (2nd-3rd/8th-9th century), Ašhab b. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz (d. 204/820) is portrayed in narrative sources after the 4th/10th century as a scholar who diverged from or even contradicted the master’s doctrine, Mālik b. Anas (d. 179/795). This article examines Ašhab’s divergence and independency through the analysis of seven anecdotes consigned in the Mālikī biographical literature between the 4th/10th and 6th/12th centuries. By placing these anecdotes in their political, social and doctrinal contexts of writing we emphasize that: 1. Ašhab’s divergence is a historical construction that is 2. the corollary of the evolution of Mālikī legal doctrine between the 3rd/9th and 6th/12th centuries. In fine , we show that an interconnection exists between the biographical tradition built on Ašhab and the evolution of the Mālikī maḏhab (doctrinal school of law)
Art · Doctrine · Formative assessment · Humanities · Literature · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |