Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How scientific literacy is conceptualized in tasks from junior secondary physics textbooks

Bibliographic Data

ID21589529
AuthorsDongsheng Wan (0000-0001-8454-3421, Soochow University), Y-J Lee (0000-0002-3286-2778, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, corresponding author), Siyuan Chen (0000-0002-3118-5963, Zhejiang Normal University), Sizhuo Chen (0000-0002-9014-4723, Zhejiang Normal University), Qing Yu (0009-0003-2546-2121, Soochow University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume48
Issue6
Pages816-839
Publication date2026-04-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09500693.2024.2429045
OpenAlexW4404658275
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited64

This study examined how scientific literacy had been conceptualised in textbook tasks based on the PISA 2018 science framework. Specifically, a total of 3888 tasks from four versions of Chinese junior secondary physics textbooks were coded on the three PISA dimensions of competencies, knowledge, and contexts. It was found that about 70% of tasks were de-contextualized and those tasks involving real contexts focused on content related to the frontiers of science and technology. More significantly, tasks testing ‘explaining scientific phenomena’ were predominant while those involving ‘interpret data and evidence scientifically’ and especially ‘evaluate and design scientific enquiry’ competencies were rare. Tasks requiring content knowledge were also overemphasised whereas the use of epistemic knowledge was downplayed. It therefore appeared that tasks in these physics textbooks emphasised the recall, understanding and verification of scientific knowledge. More meaningful task contexts related to sustainable development should be designed to develop students’ epistemic knowledge as well as promote their understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry are among the implications from this study

Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Secondary education · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy

  • Formulating a framework on social responsibility of science in primary science education

    Min Li, Huan Zhang et al.•International Journal of Science…•2026

  • Fostering scientific inquiry with hybrid intelligence

    Open Access•Chen Fan, Bo Xiong et al.•Computers & Education•2026

  • Content analysis

    Klaus Krippendorff•Content analysis•1980

  • Task-Based Language Teaching

    Open Access•David Nunan•Task-Based Language Teaching•2004

  • Pisa 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework

    OECD OECD•Pisa 2018 Assessment and…•2019

  • Academic Work

    Open Access•Walter Doyle•Review of Educational Research•1983

  • Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry-The views about scientific inquiry (Vasi) questionnaire

    Open Access•Judith Lederman, Judith S Lederman et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2014

  • The laboratory in science education

    Open Access•Avi Hofstein, Vincent N Lunetta•Science Education•2004

  • How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy

    Open Access•Stephen P Norris, Linda M Phillips•Science Education•2003

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Interrater reliability

    Open Access•Marry L McHugh•Biochemia Medica•2012

  • Textbook tasks in the Norwegian school subject natural sciences

    Open Access•Emilia Andersson-Bakken, Kirsti Marie Jegstad et al.•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation

    Open Access•Liliana Valladares, Nicolás Maurandi Abadía•Science & Education•2021

  • Social Character of Science and Its Connection to Epistemic Reliability

    Open Access•Natalia Fernández, Fernando Benitez et al.•Science & Education•2022

  • Inquiry Activity Design from Singaporean and Indonesian Physics Textbooks

    Open Access•Suarman Halawa, Ying‐Shao Hsu et al.•Science & Education•2024

  • The textbook task as a genre

    Open Access•Jonas Bakken, Emilia Andersson-Bakken•Journal of Curriculum Studies•2021

  • Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research

    Open Access•Jon D Miller•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • Outcome-based accountability regimes in OECD countries

    Open Access•Björn Högberg, Joakim Lindgren•Comparative Education•2020

  • Pisa, policy and persuasion

    Euan Auld, P Morris•Comparative Education•2016

  • Science literacy in the twenty-first century

    Open Access•Jonathan Osborne, Douglas Allchin•International Journal of Science…•2025

  • Motivating Project-Based Learning

    Phyllis C Blumenfeld, Elliot Soloway et al.•Educational Psychologist•1991

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae