What does validating a variable representation assessment tell us about how introductory chemistry and geology students use multiple external representations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21589908 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jack D Polifka (0000-0002-6712-8696, Iowa State University, corresponding author), Cinzia Cervato (0000-0003-4643-1466, Iowa State University), Thomas A Holme (0000-0003-0590-5848, Iowa State University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1396-1418 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-13 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2025.2499213 |
| OpenAlex | W4410601368 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 61 |
A key challenge for students in science classrooms is learning how to use multiple external representations (MERs) properly; when the information depicted by a representation is misunderstood, or understood correctly but misapplied, students can make improper conclusions and predictions when problem-solving. To better understand students’ rationale when interacting with MERs, 16 chemistry and geology undergraduates from a large public research university in the midwestern United States completed a card sorting activity. The activity asked each student a set of discipline-specific questions. For each question, they were given a set of 15 note cards depicting different representations and asked to select any pertinent representations for the question. As representations were selected, participants explained aloud their rationale for each. A mixed-methods analysis of the activity revealed that participants from each discipline used a standard set of five reasons for using representations: recall, visual, discipline-specific knowledge, pairing-up, and compare-and-contrast. Descriptions of each reason, along with how their usage compared between chemistry and geology students, are shared. The results from these activities suggest improvements that can be made to the assessment of students’ knowledge of MERs
Concept learning · Mathematics education · Political science · Science education · Chemistry · Mathematics · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Spatial Cognition and Navigation · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Dual coding theory and education
Working Memory
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices
A theory of reading
Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective
Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
DeFT
Multimedia and understanding
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
The functions of multiple representations
The malleability of spatial skills
| Highly cited | No |
|---|