Reframing Transnational Education Through Institutional Logics
The THRIVE Framework for Sustainable and Equitable Partnerships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21592346 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vangelis Tsiligkiris (0000-0002-5478-3464, Nottingham Trent University Nottingham UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Higher Education Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-5224 • E-ISSN: 1468-2273 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hequ.70091 |
| OpenAlex | W4416335658 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
This conceptual paper responds to growing concerns that Transnational Education (TNE) has become dominated by market imperatives, leading to persistent challenges around equity, localisation, legitimacy, and long‐term sustainability. To address these issues, the paper introduces THRIVE, a design‐oriented conceptual framework that reconceptualises TNE as a logic‐blending system grounded in Institutional Logics Theory (ILT). THRIVE comprises five interdependent pillars—Holistic Engagement, Resilience, Inclusivity, Viability, and Equity—which together enable institutions to align market objectives with academic standards, public‐good mandates, and community expectations. The paper synthesises existing literature to critique traditional TNE models and to articulate the theoretical foundations of THRIVE, demonstrating how it operationalises ILT through mechanisms such as co‐governance, curriculum co‐design, revenue sharing, and inclusive access strategies. Its analytical and practical value is illustrated through four hypothetical case studies representing mainstream TNE models, showing THRIVE's dual function as a planning tool for new initiatives and a turnaround mechanism for existing partnerships. By embedding social legitimacy and developmental alignment alongside financial sustainability, the framework offers a blueprint for reorienting TNE towards equitable, context‐responsive, and resilient global engagement. The paper concludes with implications for institutional strategy and regulatory policy, positioning THRIVE as a foundation for future reform in the governance of transnational higher education
Blueprint · Cognitive reframing · Conceptual framework · Corporate governance · Curriculum · Interdependence · Legitimacy · Mainstream · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Higher Education Governance and Development
Strategic Management
Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism
Reinsurance Trading in Lloyd’s of London
The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education
Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations
Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations
Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations
Internationalisation of higher education beyond the West
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
What Counts as Internationalization? Deconstructing the Internationalization Imperative
Inside the Hybrid Organization
Internationalization in higher education
Triple-A transnational education (TNE)
Where multilingualism and transnational education meet
Cross-Border Higher Education and Quality Assurance. Results from a Systematic Literature Review
The Epistemological Chain
Transnational education
Global engagement in the post‐pandemic world
Towards Authentic African Higher Education based on African Epistemology
Challenges and success factors of transnational higher education
Double Agendas in International Partnership Programs
The Institutional Logics Perspective
The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism
The Iron Cage Revisited
A prospective model for aligning educational quality and student experience in international higher education
Cultural differences, learning styles and transnational education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|