Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The student–faculty interaction beyond the formal curriculum in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID21592347
AuthorsBo Keum Choi (0000-0001-7113-1508, Center for Teaching and Learning Korea Nazarene University Cheonan‐si Korea), Min Sun Kim (0000-0002-3617-7823, Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy Dankook University of Korea Cheonan‐si Korea, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume75
Issue1
Pages35-50
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHigher Education Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5224 • E-ISSN: 1468-2273
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hequ.12261
OpenAlexW3021878868
LanguageEN
References cited31

The purpose of this study was to identify and categorise factors that hinder Korean college student‐faculty interaction. Twenty‐one college students who had advising experience with faculty were interviewed. Concept mapping was used to collect, organise and interpret qualitative data through quantitative techniques. These factors were recorded on index cards, and 21 participants returned and sorted these statements into self‐defined, conceptually homogeneous categories. As a result, 45 common factors were elicited and reliably organised into four clusters, with hierarchical relationship with the faculty member (Cluster 1), time constraints (Cluster 2), doubt about (academic, personal and career) benefits of interaction (Cluster 3) and a lack of recognition of necessity (Cluster 4). According to the ratings, the most important cluster was ‘doubt about benefits of interaction’, and participants rated the ‘lack of recognition of necessity’ as the cluster most similar to their own experiences

Cluster grouping · Curriculum · Higher education · Homogeneous · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Sociology · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Higher Education Research Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • What matters in college?

    Alexander W Astin•What matters in college?•1993

  • Content analysis

    Klaus Krippendorff•Content analysis•1980

  • Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation

    Mary Kane, William M K Trochim et al.•Concept Mapping for Planning and…•2007

  • Education at a Glance 2017

    OECD OECD•Education at a Glance 2017 OECD…•2017

  • Faculty do Matter

    Open Access•Paul D Umbach, Matthew R Wawrzynski•Research in Higher Education•2005

  • An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation

    Open Access•William M K Trochim•Evaluation and Program Planning•1989

  • Student–Faculty Interaction in Research Universities

    Open Access•Young K Kim, Linda J Sax•Research in Higher Education•2009

  • Concept Mapping as an Alternative Approach for the Analysis of Open-Ended Survey Responses

    Open Access•Kristin M Jackson, William M K Trochim•Organizational Research Methods•2002

  • Student-Faculty Informal Contact and College Outcomes

    Open Access•Ernest T Pascarella•Review of Educational Research•1980

  • Focus Group Interviews in Child, Youth, and Parent Research

    Open Access•Kristin Adler, Sanna Salantera et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Students' Affective Development within the College Environment

    Ernest T Pascarella•The Journal of Higher Education•1985

  • The Other Curriculum

    George D Kuh•The Journal of Higher Education•1995

  • The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in east Asia

    June Ock Yum•Communication Monographs•1988

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae