Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Judgments of learning improve multiple-choice recognition but not short-answer recall of educational text passages

Bibliographic Data

ID21602223
AuthorsNicholas P Maxwell (0000-0003-4517-8323, Midwestern State University, corresponding author), Mckinzie Adkins (Midwestern State University)
Year2026
Volume34
Issue5
Pages506-521
Publication date2026-05-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMemory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09658211.2026.2645631
PMID41866694
OpenAlexW7140081236
LanguageEN
References cited40

Judgments of learning (JOLs) can improve memory for cue-target word pairs (i.e., JOL reactivity). Prior research suggests that this effect does not extend to text passage learning, especially when memory is assessed using short-answer tests (e.g., Ariel, R., Karpicke, J. D., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2021). Do judgments of learning directly enhance learning of educational materials? Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09556-8). However, JOL reactivity is often moderated by test format and JOL phrasing, and recent findings suggest that reactivity effects are greater when recognition tests are used. We tested whether global and term-specific JOLs would improve text passage learning when memory was assessed using short-answer (Experiment 1) and multiple-choice tests (Experiments 2 and 3). Across test formats, global JOLs were non-reactive. However, term-specific JOLs produced negative reactivity on short-answer tests (Experiment 1) but positive reactivity on multiple-choice tests (Experiments 2 and 3). This positive reactivity effect was greater in Experiment 3 when term-specific JOLs used a target-present phrasing. Importantly, this effect was also observed relative to a restudy group, suggesting that positive JOL reactivity was not solely driven by increased exposure to the target information. Taken together, JOLs can improve text passage learning, but their effectiveness is linked to test format and JOL phrasing

Memory test · Metacognition · Metamemory · Recall · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Memory Processes and Influences · Reading and Literacy Development

  • A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2007

  • Monitoring one's own knowledge during study

    Asher Koriat•Journal of Experimental…•1997

  • Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.

    Asher Koriat, Morris Goldsmith•Psychological Review•1996

  • Relational and item-specific information in memory

    Open Access•R Reed Hunt, Gilles O Einstein•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1981

  • Metamemory

    Thomas O Nelson•The Psychology of learning and…•1990

  • The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity

    Open Access•Andrew P Yonelinas•Journal of Memory and Language•2002

  • A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing

    Open Access•Michael E J Masson•Behavior Research Methods•2011

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence

    Open Access•Nicholas P Maxwell, Emily E Cates et al.•Psychological Research•2024

  • Judgments of learning improve memory for word lists via enhanced item-specific encoding

    Nicholas P Maxwell•Memory•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae