Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating the Reliability and Validity Evidence of the Rime (Reporter–Interpreter–Manager–Educator) Framework for Summative Assessments Across Clerkships

Bibliographic Data

ID21613072
AuthorsMichael S Ryan (0000-0003-3266-9289, M.S. Ryanis assistant dean for clinical medical education and associate professor of pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia; ORCID:., corresponding author), Bennett Lee (B. Leeis associate professor of internal medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.), Alicia Richards (0000-0002-4869-2945, A. Richardsis a doctoral student in the department of biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.), Robert A Perera (0000-0002-0375-0427, R.A. Pererais associate professor of biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.), Kellen Haley (K. Haleyis a resident in neurology at the University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan. At the time of initial drafting of this manuscript, Dr. Haley was a fourth-year medical student at Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.), Fidelma Rigby (Virginia Commonwealth University), Fidelma B Rigby (F.B. Rigbyis associate professor and clerkship director of obstetrics and gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.), Young-Shin Park (0000-0001-8583-4335, Y.S. Parkis associate professor and associate head, department of medical education, and director of research, office of educational affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID:.), Sally A Santen (0000-0002-8327-8002, S.A. Santenis senior associate dean for evaluation, assessment and scholarship, and professor of emergency medicine Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia; ORCID:.)
Year2021
Volume96
Issue2
Pages256-262
Publication date2021-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAcademic Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1040-2446 • E-ISSN: 1938-808X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/acm.0000000000003811
PMID33116058
OpenAlexW3097218075
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited20

PURPOSE: The ability of medical schools to accurately and reliably assess medical student clinical performance is paramount. The RIME (reporter-interpreter-manager-educator) schema was originally developed as a synthetic and intuitive assessment framework for internal medicine clerkships. Validity evidence of this framework has not been rigorously evaluated outside of internal medicine. This study examined factors contributing to variability in RIME assessment scores using generalizability theory and decision studies across multiple clerkships, thereby contributing to its internal structure validity evidence. METHOD: Data were collected from RIME-based summative clerkship assessments during 2018-2019 at Virginia Commonwealth University. Generalizability theory was used to explore variance attributed to different facets through a series of unbalanced random-effects models by clerkship. For all analyses, decision (D-) studies were conducted to estimate the effects of increasing the number of assessments. RESULTS: From 231 students, 6,915 observations were analyzed. Interpreter was the most common RIME designation (44.5%-46.8%) across all clerkships. Variability attributable to students ranged from 16.7% in neurology to 25.4% in surgery. D-studies showed the number of assessments needed to achieve an acceptable reliability (0.7) ranged from 7 in pediatrics and surgery to 11 in internal medicine and 12 in neurology. However, depending on the clerkship each student received between 3 and 8 assessments. CONCLUSIONS: This study conducted generalizability- and D-studies to examine the internal structure validity evidence of RIME clinical performance assessments across clinical clerkships. Substantial proportion of variance in RIME assessment scores was attributable to the rater, with less attributed to the student. However, the proportion of variance attributed to the student was greater than what has been demonstrated in other generalizability studies of summative clinical assessments. Overall, these findings support the use of RIME as a framework for assessment across clerkships and demonstrate the number of assessments required to obtain sufficient reliability

Formative assessment · Generalizability theory · Hard rime · Internal validity · Mathematics education · Medical education · Summative assessment · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Psychology · Radiology practices and education · Surgical Simulation and Training

  • Emerging Issues in Assessment in Medical Education

    Laura Weiss Roberts•Academic Medicine•2021

  • Clerkship Assessment Reliability Based on Assessor Type and Assessor-Student Contact Frequency

    Christopher D Mattson, Celia Laird O’Brien et al.•Academic Medicine•2025

  • Threshold Genres

    Open Access•Dana Lynn Driscoll, Omar Yacoub•Written Communication•2022

  • Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education

    Joshua Lockyer, Jocelyn Lockyer et al.•Medical Teacher•2017

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae