Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender Distribution of Authors of Evaluation Letters for Promotion at One Medical School

Bibliographic Data

ID21614402
AuthorsMary E Logeais (M.E. Logeaisis assistant professor, Department of Medicine, and general internist, Division of Geriatrics, Palliative and Primary Care, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota; ORCID:., corresponding author), Maggie Eckerstorfer (0000-0002-3758-0649, University of Minnesota Medical Center), Margaret Eckerstorfer (M. Eckerstorferis mobile health initiative lead coordinator and past executive assistant for faculty affairs, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.), K Krohn (0000-0001-6116-7128, University of Minnesota), Kristina M Krohn (K.M. Krohnis assistant professor and hospitalist, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; ORCID:.), Susan A Everson‐rose (0000-0002-9839-2537, H ea lt hP ar tn er s), Susan A Everson-Rose (S.A. Everson-Roseis professor, Department of Medicine, associate director for research, Division of Geriatrics, Palliative and Primary Care, associate director, Program in Health Disparities Research, and director, Health Equity Leadership and Mentoring Program, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota; ORCID), Amanda Termuhlen (0000-0002-4072-5546, University of Minnesota Medical Center), Amanda M Termuhlen (A.M. Termuhlenis professor, Department of Pediatrics, and associate dean, Department of Faculty Affairs, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota; ORCID:.), Anne M Joseph (0000-0002-3440-2679, A.M. Josephis Wexler Professor of Medicine and vice chair for faculty affairs and diversity, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. ORCID:.)
Year2022
Volume97
Issue12
Pages1816-1823
Publication date2022-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAcademic Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1040-2446 • E-ISSN: 1938-808X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/acm.0000000000004803
PMID35794809
OpenAlexW4284892932
LanguageEN
References cited36

PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in key leadership positions and advanced ranks in academic medicine. This study examines the numbers of men and women letter writers for promotion candidates during a 5-year period across departments, tracks, ranks, and candidate gender. METHOD: A descriptive study characterized the gender of evaluation letter writers for candidates for promotion to associate or full professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School between 2015 and 2020. Letter writer and candidate gender were characterized by self-identified pronouns in the faculty biography or dossier. Letter writer gender was described by candidate department, promotion track, rank, terminal degree, and gender. RESULTS: Among 299 candidates for promotion, 172 (58%) were men and 127 (42%) were women; dossiers included 3,995 evaluation letters. Across all years, men wrote more letters than women (external letters, range, 69% in 2019-2020 to 75% in 2015-2016; internal letters, range, 67% in 2018-2019 to 77% in 2015-2016). Candidates in the family medicine and pediatrics departments had the highest percentages of letters written by women (44% and 40%, respectively). No differences were found in the number of women letter writers by candidate promotion track; however, differences were found by candidate rank (associate professor, 30%; full professor, 23%) and terminal degree (MD/DO, 25%; PhD, 33%; MD-PhD, 20%). Regardless of candidate gender, most evaluation letters were written by men. Women candidates had 15% to 20% more letters authored by women than men candidates (34%-40% vs 18%-23%). CONCLUSIONS: The gender pattern of letter writers may reflect implicit biases regarding gender and perceived leadership status, expertise, and success. Adopting policies that promote or require gender diversity among letter writers for promotion candidates may provide an opportunity to encourage faculty to seek diverse networks and recognize the achievements of women faculty

Family medicine · Health promotion · Medical education · Political science · Public health · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Law · Medicine · Mentoring and Academic Development · Nursing · Psychology · Sex and Gender in Healthcare

  • Where Are We in Bridging the Gender Leadership Gap in Academic Medicine

    Hannah A Valantine•Academic Medicine•2020

  • The Association of American Medical Colleges

    FRED C ZAPFFE•Academic Medicine•1938

  • The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution

    Molly Carnes, Patricia G Devine et al.•Academic Medicine•2014

  • Addressing disparities in academic medicine

    Open Access•José E Rodríguez, K M Campbell et al.•BMC Medical Education•2015

  • Institutional Variation in the Promotion of Racial/Ethnic Minority Faculty at US Medical Schools

    Marcella Nunez-Smith, Maria M Ciarleglio et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2012

  • Gender Discrimination and Evaluators’ Gender

    Open Access•Maria De Paola, Vincenzo Scoppa•Economica•2015

  • Gender Bias in Student Evaluations

    Kristina M W Mitchell, Jonathan Martins et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae