Modeling university teachers’ AI adoption and practice trajectories using longitudinal learning analytics
A three-semester observational study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21631845 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuanyuan Yu (0000-0002-6201-2002, Gannan Normal University), Xiaolong Zeng (Ganzhou Teachers College), Quan Shao (0000-0002-2294-0138, Gannan Normal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-19 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interactive Learning Environments (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10494820.2026.2637612 |
| OpenAlex | W7133847620 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
The higher education sector requires empirical evidence on how artificial intelligence (AI) can use longitudinal learning analytics on digital trace data. This study developed and tested a longitudinal learning analytics strategy to model teacher AI adoption and trace-based teaching-practice trajectories over three semesters, identify actionable predictors, and inform scalable, equity-sensitive monitoring and support. Data were collected from 312 faculty members across three Chinese universities through digital traces of learning-management logs, automated assessments, and tutorials. Instructors in the higher-engagement cohort increased their routine use of intelligent tools, diversified workflows, and reduced adaptation time, which was associated with improved course indicators. Three signal events per week, portfolio diversity, and adaptation latency were the strongest statistical predictors of outcome change. Teaching activity rose by 4.4 events per week, pass rates increased by 3.5 percentage points, and a large time-by-cohort interaction was observed (F(1,308) = 96.8; η2 = 0.239). Heat maps revealed a lasting shift from passive to active profiles, while radar profiles underscored the importance of intensity, diversity, and adaptation speed. Institutions can apply these findings by monitoring the three signals to enhance faculty practice. Practice indicators is conceptualized here as an emergent, trace-observed change in teaching practice rather than a standardized intervention or dosage-delivered program
Educational technology · Electronic learning · Experiential learning · Longitudinal study · Observational learning · Observational study · E-Learning and COVID-19 · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics
Can we open the black box of AI?
Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions
Online learning amid the Covid-19 pandemic
Artificial intelligence in education
Determinants of Intention to Use ChatGPT for Educational Purposes
Bridging AI literacy and UTAUT constructs
Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education
Navigating the landscape of AI literacy education
AI-driven language learning in higher education
AI in higher education
Chatbots in higher education
Developing intelligent-TPACK (I-TPACK) framework from unpacking AI literacy and competency
Personalising with AI in higher education
Higher Education AI Policies—A Document Analysis of University Guidelines
ChatGPT in Higher Education
Let's Talk About EdTech ! A Topic Modelling Analysis of AI Tools and Pre‐Service Teachers' Perspectives
The Impact of AI on the Personal and Collaborative Learning Environments in Higher Education
Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technologies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |