Effect of different grouping arrangements on students’ achievement and experience in collaborative learning environment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21632201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kanika Kanika (0000-0002-8352-9940, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, corresponding author), Shampa Chakraverty (0000-0002-0267-8670, Netaji Subhas University of Technology), Pinaki Chakraborty (0000-0002-2010-8022, Netaji Subhas University of Technology), Manan Madan (Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, Delhi, India) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 6366-6378 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interactive Learning Environments (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10494820.2022.2036764 |
| OpenAlex | W4213343239 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 33 |
The study aims to investigate the effect of homogenous and heterogeneous grouping on students’ achievement and experiences of learning in a collaborative environment. A collaborative learning environment has been used as a pedagogical tool for a long time now. However, there is no clarity on which grouping strategy to use. In this paper, we study the impact of grouping on students’ performances. We aim to examine how different grouping arrangements, leading to different learning environments, affect students’ academic achievement. Also, in most cases homogeneity or heterogeneity is decided on the basis of students’ ability. For group learning, students were grouped into two different settings on the basis of their learning perspectives derived from class notes and their personality types. In the present study, we used a novel algorithm based on k modes clustering. Grouping indeed improved students’ performance, particularly, the heterogeneous groups performed better than the homogenous groups. Students’ experience with learning in the two different environments indicates that they were more satisfied with homogeneous group settings
CLARITY · Cluster analysis · Cluster grouping · Collaborative learning · Cooperative learning · Homogeneous · Mathematics education · Teaching method · Computer Science · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Mathematics · Online and Blended Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
What kind of matching groups makes students benefit more? The role of reviewer expertise and document quality within-groups
Innovation-driven group composition for effective collaborative programming
A systematic review of intelligent grouping in collaborative learning
Leveraging peer interaction for solving mathematical proof problems
Algorithmic group formation and group work evaluation in a learning analytics-enhanced environment
Age similarity enhances older adults’ learning from co-viewing video lectures
A Framework for Engaging Emergent Bilinguals in Psychosocial Group Programs in Schools
Exploring students' learning performance in computer‐supported collaborative learning environment during and after pandemic
Algorithm as 136
Extensions to the k-Means Algorithm for Clustering Large Data Sets with Categorical Values
Benefits of collaborative learning
A Comparison of Written Chinese Achievement Among Heritage Learners in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups
An Educational Psychology Success Story
Teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |