Couple Relationship Education
Before and During Covid-19
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21638680 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joshua J Turner (0000-0002-7974-8438, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA, corresponding author), Kay Bradford (Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA), Brian J Higginbotham (Utah State University), Brian Higginbotham (Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA), Elisabeth Juhasz (Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 596-604 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Family Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-4807 • E-ISSN: 1552-3950 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10664807221104126 |
| OpenAlex | W4282001465 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 33 |
The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have required program planners to re-evaluate the provision of relationship education (RE). The current mixed-methods study focuses on the Healthy Relationships [State] initiative's transition from in-person to virtual online RE programing, measuring program impact and comparing the outcomes between the two delivery methods for individuals participating in Couple LINKS, a curriculum designed for adults in committed relationships. Comparisons between delivery methods revealed that in-person participants showed greater gains than virtual participants on key program measures; however, the outcomes were positive for all. Qualitative responses of virtual participants revealed what they liked most and liked least about the virtual format, citing their appreciation for the curriculum, the opportunity to develop new skills, facilitator quality, online accessibility, and couple time. Schedule conflicts and uneven course pacing, reference materials, technology, and sharing personal information were listed as things participants liked least about the virtual program. Implications for the future delivery of RE programs are discussed
Curriculum · Facilitator · Medical education · Pedagogy · Schedule · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Computer Science · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria
Relationship Education Research
Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study.
Interrater agreement and interrater reliability
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of Covid-19
Examining the Outcomes of the InsideOut Dad Fatherhood Education Program for Incarcerated Minority Fathers
Behind the (Virtual) Mirror
Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue
The Impact of Training Videos on Attitudes About Parenting After Divorce
Impacts of Parents Forever on Parental Behavior and Adjustment During Divorce
Evaluation of a Research-Based Parenting Education Program for Divorcing Parents
Is One Hour Enough? Evaluating Utah’s Online Divorce Education Course Based on Course Length Satisfaction
Qualitative inquiry and research design
Assessing Commitment in Personal Relationships
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |