Evaluating the effect of displaying team vs. individual metrics on team performance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21642393 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jamiahus Walton (0000-0001-5576-6634, Clemson University, corresponding author), Stephen B Gilbert (0000-0002-5332-029X, Bissell (United States)) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 160 |
| Pages | 102759 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1071-5819 • E-ISSN: 1095-9300 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102759 |
| OpenAlex | W2983260047 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 55 |
This work explores the assessment dimension of persistent feedback to a team, i.e., how presenting feedback based on individual scores vs. team scores vs. both (I&T) affects team performance and team dynamics of a three-person team. Various studies have attempted to determine which level of feedback interdependence (i.e., individual vs. team vs. I&T), presented within a collaborative context, produced optimal team performance. The studies have shown mixed results. Precisely 117 participants (39 three-person Teams) conducted a modified version of the Multiple Errands Test known as the Team Multiple Errands Test (TMET). The teams performed the TMET within a virtual desktop environment. They performed the task in three real-time persistent feedback conditions: Individual, Team, and I&T. Overall, the feedback condition seemed to influence the speed with which team members completed the task. Specifically, the results indicated that individuals in the Team feedback condition moved more quickly through the task than individuals in the I&T feedback condition. There were no significant differences between the Individual condition and the Team or I&T conditions. We suggest that user interface (UI) designers developing persistent feedback for a virtual collaborative training environment should primarily present feedback based on team assessment, as opposed to the I&T assessment, and to be cautious of information overload
Human–computer interaction · Knowledge management · Psychological safety · Team composition · Team effectiveness · Team leader · Virtual team · Applied Psychology · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Engineering · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Psychology · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance
Exploratory data analysis
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace
On the Rate of Gain of Information
Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.
The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems
Effectsize
Multiple Resources and Mental Workload
Least-Squares Means
Robust statistical methods
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Collaboration in the 21st century
Evaluation of an intelligent team tutoring system for a collaborative two-person problem
AutoTutor
Knowledge of results and motor learning
The Power of Feedback
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |