Psychometric Properties of the Recovery Home Environment Scale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21646303 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Douglas L Polcin (0000-0002-6518-8628, Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California, USA, corresponding author), Elizabeth Mahoney (0000-0001-5882-8327, Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California, USA), Amy A Mericle (0000-0002-5615-0310, Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1161-1168 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Substance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10826084.2021.1910710 |
| PMID | 33870847 |
| OpenAlex | W3156736556 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 23 |
BACKGROUND: Recovery homes for persons with alcohol and drug problems provide an abstinent living environment and social support for recovery. Research shows residents in these homes make significant, sustained improvements. However, descriptions of recovery environments within the homes have been limited. PURPOSE: The current study assessed psychometric properties for the Recovery Home Environment Scale (RHES), which assessed social environments within one type of recovery home, sober living houses (SLHs). METHODS: 373 residents were interviewed at entry into the house, 1-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Measures included the RHES, other measures of the social environment, days of substance use, and length of stay. RESULTS: Principal components analysis suggested the RHES was largely unidimensional. Exploratory factor analysis suggested items could be grouped into recovery support (3 items) and recovery skills (5 items). Cronbach's alphas for the full scale and the recovery support and recovery skills subscales were 0.91, 0.89, and 0.87, respectively. As hypothesized, construct validity of the RHES was supported by correlations with other measures of the social environment and predictive validity was supported by associations with length of stay and substance use. CONCLUSIONS: SLHs have been described as "the setting is the service." However, the field has lacked a way to capture characteristics of the social environment. The RHES represents a new way to measure the recovery environment by focusing on social interactions among residents within SLHs and shared activities in the community
Construct validity · Content validity · Cronbach's alpha · Exploratory factor analysis · Psychometrics · Social support · Clinical Psychology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes · Gerontology
Exploring medication for opioid use disorder and recovery housing in the United States
Measuring Architecture in Recovery Homes
Do neighborhood characteristics of sober living houses impact recovery outcomes? A multilevel analysis of observational data from Los Angeles County
Outcomes Among Sober Living House Residents Who Relapse
Pathways to Peer Support in Sober Living Houses
Social model recovery and recovery housing
Giving and receiving help in three contexts as predictors of alcohol outcomes in a longitudinal study of sober living house residents
Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses
The Oxford House Stability Questionnaire
An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients
Data with Hierarchical Structure
Co-occurring substance abuse and mental health problems among homeless persons
Community context of sober living houses
Understanding challenges for recovery homes during Covid-19
Maximizing Social Model Principles in Residential Recovery Settings
Contrasting Social Climates of Small Peer‐Run Versus a Larger Staff‐Run Substance Abuse Recovery Setting
Recovery home networks as social capital
| Citations per year | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |