An Analysis of Prospective Responsibilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21700835 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ann Whittle (0000-0003-4193-8911, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 769-794 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1382-4554 • E-ISSN: 1572-8609 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10892-024-09491-8 |
| OpenAlex | W4401569359 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
In this paper, I offer an analysis of prospective responsibilities. I begin by surveying recent accounts of prospective responsibilities and positioning my view within that literature. Then I offer a more detailed analysis of a shared component of these accounts, namely the claim that S is prospectively responsible for φ only if S has to ‘see to it that φ
Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|