A reply to Gillham on the impairment principle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21702661 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruce P Blackshaw (0000-0002-9115-582X, University of Birmingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-35 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-7423 • E-ISSN: 1572-8633 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11019-023-10180-w |
| PMID | 37902932 |
| OpenAlex | W4388033412 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
Alternative medicine · Epistemology · Medical law · Pathology · Philosophy of biology · Philosophy of medicine · Philosophy of science · Psychiatry · Medicine · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology
Why Abortion is Immoral
The impairment argument, ethics of abortion, and nature of impairing to the n + 1 degree
Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion
Why the wrongness of intentionally impairing children in utero does not imply the wrongness of abortion
Against the impairment argument
On the impairment argument
| Highly cited | No |
|---|