Inquiry in higher education for sustainable development
Crossing disciplinary knowledge boundaries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21721268 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cecília Galvão (0000-0002-0347-4872, University of Lisbon), Cláudia Faria (0000-0003-1278-8061, University of Lisbon), Wanda Viegas (0000-0003-4660-1226, University of Lisbon), Amélia Branco (0000-0002-3672-8066, University of Lisbon), Luis F Goulao (0000-0002-4613-8588, University of Lisbon), Luís Goulão |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 291-307 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1467-6370 • E-ISSN: 1758-6739 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijshe-02-2020-0068 |
| OpenAlex | W3107491426 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 16 |
Purpose This paper aims to understand if a project work methodology proposed to students, based on an inquiry perspective and dealing with different dimensions of sustainable development, contributed to creating an interdisciplinary solution for a problem on sustainability challenged by food production and consumption, and also to understand if this methodological approach is perceived as important to their learning as professionals and citizens. Data were collected by direct observation, a questionnaire applied to the students and students’ individual reflections. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to present the research results of the impact of a pedagogical approach on students, implemented as a part of the Doctoral Programme in Sustainability Science, which was designed following an innovative model at the University of Lisbon, Portugal. The main drivers include building a new body of interdisciplinary knowledge leading to the application of science to address real problems towards transdisciplinary education. Findings The results suggest great potential for an inquiry perspective in trying to solve a real problem. Students’ proposals were realistic, viable and complementary enough to collectively contribute in response to the global problem. The use of approaches acquired from different areas of knowledge was clear, and the project methodology was well understood. Students considered the experience very rewarding in terms of learning and contributing positively to their personal and professional development. Originality/value This Doctoral programme is anchored in a progressive continuum encompassing holistic debates with a multidisciplinary team of professors in environments that promote interdisciplinary attitudes and new knowledge, and also project work aimed at guiding students to transdisciplinary learning, which constitutes an innovative form of dealing with the complex challenges created by the science of sustainability
Discipline · Education for sustainable development · Engineering ethics · Knowledge management · Multidisciplinary approach · Originality · Pedagogy · Political science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Sustainability in Higher Education
Challenge-based, interdisciplinary learning for sustainability in doctoral education
Hackathon
Contribution of sustainable and integrated rural development programmes to personal and professional growth
Boundaries and boundary crossing in a multidisciplinary online higher education course on forest bioeconomy
Rethinking education
Pedagogy for Sustainability Science
Activist Science and Technology Education
Foundations of transdisciplinarity
Towards a revolution in sustainability education
Tackling Complex Social Challenges within Neoliberal Constraints
Graffiti, Aging and Subcultural Memory—A Struggle for Recognition through Podcast Narratives
Learning for change
Key competencies in sustainability
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |