Ethical-Reparative Reconfigurations of the Literary Today
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21728966 |
|---|---|
| Authors | André Cechinel (0000-0002-6620-3447, Purdue University West Lafayette, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | CLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1481-4374 • E-ISSN: 1481-4374 |
| Publisher | Purdue University (bepress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.7771/1481-4374.3752 |
| OpenAlex | W4221070620 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
This essay aims to debate the evidence of an ethical-reparative function for literature and literary studies today. Therefore, it is divided into two fundamental moments, two argumentative channels that, without a totalizing intention, point out the general perspective of the current, changing, stuation. On the one hand, the literature of the 20th century is presented through the image of a supposed negativity or radical intransitivity, capable of “undoing the work” in its “aesthetics of suppression.” On the other hand, from an introductory debate around some of the places of transitivity envisioned for literature at the beginning of the 21th century, the literary is now conceived as an ethical-reparative field, responsible, among others, for “giving visibility,” “remembering,” “repairing damage,” “comforting,” etc. This transition results in a notion of growing discomfort in relation to social artifacts that, even in the artistic field, cannot be reconciled with a utilitarianism that cannot preserve anything intact, not even literature
Aesthetics · Argumentative · Art · Epistemology · Literary criticism · Literature · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Undoing · Utilitarianism · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |