Digital Versus Printed Multilingual Dictionary
Developing Young Learners' English Literacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21806320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ni Made Ratminingsih (0000-0001-9367-2196, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha), Ketut Agustini (0000-0003-2896-2984, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha), I Gede Budasi (Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha), Luh Putu Sri Adnyani (Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha), I Ketut Trika Adi Ana (0000-0002-6939-3952, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 2508-2518 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692 |
| Publisher | Academy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17507/tpls.1212.05 |
| OpenAlex | W4311067452 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
This study aimed to compare the effect of digital and printed multilingual dictionaries on young learners' literacy. Besides, it also explored the students’ responses on the implementation of those dictionaries. To achieve the study's objectives, the researchers followed a sequential mixed method that started with the quantitative method and followed with the qualitative method. There were two classes involved in this study. Those two classes were selected using the matching technique. One class was treated as an experimental class, while the other was the control class. To collect the study's data, the researchers used a literacy test for the quantitative method and a questionnaire, and an interview guide for the qualitative method. The quantitative data were analyzed statistically using an independent t-test, while the qualitative data were analyzed using an interactive data analysis model. This study statistically confirmed that the digital multilingual dictionary was better than the printed dictionary. The results of the questionnaire and interview supported the finding that young learners had positive responses toward the use of both dictionary, however they also affirmed that the digital dictionary was more interesting and could help them more to study English vocabulary with the pronunciations
Linguistics · Literacy · Machine learning · Mathematics education · Natural language processing · Pedagogy · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Statistics · Vocabulary · Computer Science · Educational Methods and Media Use · English Language Learning and Teaching · Lexicography and Language Studies · Mathematics · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Multicompetence
Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during the Covid-19 pandemic in Nigeria
Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during Covid -19 pandemic
Multilingualism in Education
Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use
Millennials as Dictionary Users
Exploring the Reading Practices of Undergraduate Students
Does technology improve reading outcomes? Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICT interventions for early grade reading in Kenya
Dictionaries for learners of English
The Sooner, the Better
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |