Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pragmatic Competence in Learner English

The Case of Jordanian EFL Learners

Bibliographic Data

ID21806969
AuthorsDina M Hammouri (0000-0001-7274-1615, University of Jordan), Rajai R Al-Khanji, Rajai Al-Khanji (0000-0002-2006-3098, University of Jordan)
Year2023
Volume13
Issue4
Pages1076-1086
Publication date2023-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692
PublisherAcademy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.17507/tpls.1304.30
OpenAlexW4362455998
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

The study investigates the Jordanian EFL learners’ pragmatic competence through their production of the speech acts of responding to requests, making suggestions, making threats and expressing farewells. The sample of the study consists of 130 Jordanian EFL learners and native speakers. 2600 responses were collected through a Discourse Completion Test (DCT). The findings of the study revealed that the tested students showed similarities and differences in performing the strategies of four speech acts. Differences in the students’ performances led to pragmatic failure instances. The pragmatic failure committed by students refers to lack of linguistic competence (i.e., pragmalinguistic failure), sociocultural differences and pragmatic transfer (i.e., sociopragmatic failure). EFL learners employed many mechanisms to maintain their communicative competence; the analysis of the test on speech acts showed learners’ tendency towards using particular strategies, resorting to one strategy related to their grammatical competence, prefabrication, performing long forms, buffing and transfer. The results were also suggestive of the learners’ lack of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic knowledge. The implications of this study are for language teachers to teach interlanguage pragmatics explicitly in EFL contexts to draw learners’ attention to both pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic features, pay more attention to these areas and allocate more time and practice to solve learners’ problems in these areas. The implication of this study is also for pedagogical material designers to provide sufficient and well-organized pragmatic input

Communicative competence · Interlanguage · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Politeness · Pragmatics · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching · Social Psychology

  • The effect of digital game-based group dynamic assessment on L2 pragmatic competence

    Saba Bashiri, Saman Ebadi•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Too Many Words

    Open Access•Shoshana Blum‐kulka, Shoshana Blum-Kulka et al.•Studies in Second Language…•1986

  • Linguistic mitigating devices in American and Jordanian students' requests

    Mohammed Nahar Al-Ali, Rami Alawneh•Intercultural Pragmatics•2010

  • Suggestions

    Open Access•Xiangying Jiang•System•2006

  • The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language

    Peter T Daniels, David Crystal•Language•1992

  • Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure

    J Thomas•Applied Linguistics•1983

  • Learning how to read situations and know what is the right thing to say or do in an L2

    Open Access•Ming-Chung Yu•Journal of Pragmatics•2011

  • When in Rome

    Open Access•Eli Hinkel•Journal of Pragmatics•1996

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae